Advances in germanium detector technology for IWORID Amsterdam, The Netherlands 08 -12 September 2002 Pat Sangsingkeow ORTEC
RESOLUTION 1. 17 Me. V 1. 33 Me. V Na. I(Tl) Ge 2
3
Reasons for abandoning in late 1970’s: • Difficult to work with. • Too small.
1980 2000 ORTEC 5
PLANAR STRUCTURE 70 mm X 130 mm 75 mm X 75 mm 25 mm X 25 mm ORTEC
mid 1990’s Photo courtesy of The Naval Research Laboratory
2000 8
NASA Standard Quartz Disc Parrafin Graphite Courtesy of Argonne National Laboratory 9
Courtesy of Argonne National Laboratory
2000 Closed-end Coaxial 1975 -2002 Early 1970’s ORTEC 6
Photo courtesy of UC Berkeley, Space Sciences Laboratory 12
HESSI High. Energy Solar Spectroscopic I mager Photo courtesy of NASA and HESSI Team 13
SEGMENTED COAXIAL The University of Liverpool ORTEC 14
INFORMATION FROM PULSE RISE TIME PHOTON FRONT CONTACT Front contact +V electron Back contact hole -V BACK CONTACT Courtesy of NRL & XIA 15
IMAGE CHARGES IN NEIGHBOR SEGMENTS PHOTON Neighbor-A Event Neighbor-B Segment +V FRONT CONTACT Shallow Interaction Deep Interaction -V BACK CONTACT Holes Electrons 17
INFORMATION FROM NEAR NEIGHBORS Neighbor-A segment Event segment Rear segment Shallow interaction Neighbor-B segment Event segment Rear channel Deep interaction 18
CONCLUSIONS: • Germanium is back into imaging !!! • Germanium has potential of achieving 10 times better position resolution than other current technologies. HPGe. DSSD Segmented Coax