Advanced Topic Alternative Architectures Chapter 9 Objectives Learn

Advanced Topic: Alternative Architectures Chapter 9 Objectives • Learn the properties that often distinguish RISC from CISC architectures. • Understand how multiprocessor architectures are classified. • Appreciate the factors that create complexity in multiprocessor systems. • Become familiar with the ways in which some architectures transcend the traditional von Neumann paradigm. 1

Introduction • We have so far studied only the simplest models of computer systems; classical single-processor von Neumann systems. • This chapter presents a number of different approaches to computer organization and architecture. • Some of these approaches are in place in today’s commercial systems. Others may form the basis for the computers of the future. 2

Typical Architecture Already Explored ALU carries out the logic operations (comparisons) and arithmetic operations (adding, etc). Each memory location has a unique address. Each location can store a word Control Unit monitors and control the execution of all instructions and the transfer of all information CU extracts the instruction from memory, decodes the instructions, make sure data is in the right place at the right time, tell the ALU which registers to use, services interrupts, turn on the correct circuitry in the ALU for operation execution Dr. Clincy Lecture 3

ARCHITECTURE APPROACHES • Complex Instruction Set Computer (CISC) • • • Large number of instructions, of variable length Instructions have complex layouts A single instruction can be complex and perform multiple operations ISSUE: a small subset of CISC instructions slows the system down EXAMPLE: Intel x 86 Architectures Reduced Instruction Set Computer (RISC) • • Because of CISC’s issue, designers return to less complicated architecture and hardwired a small, but complete instruction set Hardwired instructions are much faster Compiler is responsible for producing efficient code for Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) Simple instructions that execute faster Each instruction only performs one operation All instructions are the SAME size EXAMPLE: Pentium family and MIPS family of CPUs (Microprocessor without Interlocked Pipeline Stages)

RISC vs CISC Analogy ENGLISH Today is your birthday 19 symbols CHINESE 今天是你的生日 7 symbols

RISC Vs CISC Machines • The underlying philosophy of RISC machines is that a system is better able to manage program execution when the program consists of only a few different instructions that are the same length and require the same number of clock cycles to decode and execute. • RISC systems access memory only with explicit load and store instructions. • In CISC systems, many different kinds of instructions access memory, making instruction length variable and fetch-decode-execute time unpredictable. 6

RISC Vs CISC Machines • The difference between CISC and RISC becomes evident through the basic computer performance equation: • RISC systems shorten execution time by reducing the clock cycles per instruction. • CISC systems improve performance by reducing the number of instructions per program. 7

RISC Vs CISC Machines • The simple instruction set of RISC machines enables control units to be hardwired for maximum speed. • The more complex and variable length instruction set of CISC machines requires microcode-based control units that interpret instructions as they are fetched from memory. This translation takes time. • With fixed-length instructions, RISC lends itself to pipelining and speculative execution (more predictive). 8

RISC Vs CISC Machines • Consider the program fragments: CISC mov ax, 10 mov bx, 5 mul bx, ax RISC Begin mov ax, 0 mov bx, 10 mov cx, 5 add ax, bx loop Begin • The total clock cycles for the CISC version might be: (2 movs 1 cycle) + (1 mul 30 cycles) = 32 cycles • While the clock cycles for the RISC version is: (3 movs 1 cycle) + (5 adds 1 cycle) + (5 loops 1 cycle) = 13 cycles • With RISC clock cycle being shorter, RISC gives us much faster execution speeds. 9

RISC Machines • By reducing instruction complexity, simpler chips are needed – as a result, transistors heavily used by CISC can be used in more innovative ways like: pipelines, cache and registers • CISC procedure calls and parameter passing involves considerable effort and resources – Involves saving a return address – Preserving register values – Passing parameters by pushing on a stack or using registers – Branching to the subroutine – Executing the subroutine – Once it returns to the calling program after the subroutine execution, parameter value modifications are saved – Previous register values are restored • Freeing up registers from the above tasks provide RISC machines hundreds of registers to create register environments • Because of their load-store ISAs, RISC architectures require a large number of CPU registers. • These register provide fast access to data during sequential program execution. • They can also be employed to reduce the overhead typically caused by passing parameters to subprograms. • Instead of pulling parameters off of a stack, the subprogram is directed to use a subset of registers. 10

RISC Registers • Instead of pulling parameters off of a stack, the subprogram is directed to use a subset of registers. • Each subset of registers is called a register window set • By having all of the registers divided in various sets, when a program is executing in a particular environment, only one certain register set is being used or visible • If the program changes to a different environment (ie. Procedure is called), then a different set of registers is used or visible • This approach is faster and much less complex than “reusing the same registers” • Regarding parameter passing using this register window set approach, the windows must overlap. • The window set overlapping is accomplished by dividing the register window set into distinct partitions, which include – Global Registers: common to all windows – Local Registers: local to the current window – Input Registers: overlaps with the preceding window’s output registers – Output Registers: overlaps with the next window’s input registers 11

RISC Registers • Typical real RISC architectures include 16 register sets (or windows) of 32 registers each. • The CPU is restricted to operating in only one single window at a time. • So, for any snap shot of time, only 32 registers are available. • This is how registers can be overlapped in a RISC system. • When procedure one calls procedure two, any parameters needing to be passed are placed into the output register set of procedure one • Once procedure two begins to execute, the output registers of P 1 becomes the input registers for P 2 • The current window pointer (CWP) points to the active register window. 12 8 Global Registers (R 0 -R 7), 8 Input Registers (R 8 -R 15), 8 Local Registers (R 16 -R 23) and 8 Output Registers (R 24 -R 31)

RISC Vs CISC • RISC • CISC – Multiple register sets. – Three operands per instruction. – Parameter passing through register windows. – Single-cycle instructions. – Hardwired control. – Highly pipelined. – Single register set. – One or two register operands per instruction. – Parameter passing through memory. – Multiple cycle instructions. – Microprogrammed control. – Less pipelined. Continued. . 13

RISC Vs CISC • RISC – Simple instructions, few in number. – Fixed length instructions. – Complexity in compiler. – Only LOAD/STORE instructions access memory. – Few addressing modes. • CISC – Many complex instructions. – Variable length instructions. – Complexity in microcode. – Many instructions can access memory. – Many addressing modes. 14

RISC Vs CISC Machines Today • It is becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish RISC architectures from CISC architectures today. • Some RISC systems provide more extravagant instruction sets than some CISC systems. • Some systems combine both approaches. • With the rise of embedded systems and mobile computing, the terms RISC and CISC have lost their significance • The RISC Vs CISC debate started when chip-area and processor design complexity were issues – now energy and power are the issues. • The two top competitors today are ARM and Intel – Intel focus on performance and ARM focus on efficiency 15