Advanced LIGO Daniel Sigg for the LIGO Scientific

  • Slides: 19
Download presentation
Advanced LIGO Daniel Sigg, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration TAUP, University of Washington September

Advanced LIGO Daniel Sigg, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration TAUP, University of Washington September 8, 2003 LIGO Scientific Collaboration G 030488 -00 -M 1

Advanced LIGO q q LIGO mission: detect gravitational waves and initiate GW astronomy Next

Advanced LIGO q q LIGO mission: detect gravitational waves and initiate GW astronomy Next detector Ø Should have assured detectability of known sources Ø Should be at the limits of reasonable extrapolations of detector physics and technologies Ø Must be a realizable, practical, reliable instrument Ø Should come into existence neither too early nor too late Advanced LIGO Scientific Collaboration G 030488 -00 -M 2

Initial and Advanced LIGO Factor 10 better amplitude sensitivity q Ø (Reach)3 = rate

Initial and Advanced LIGO Factor 10 better amplitude sensitivity q Ø (Reach)3 = rate Factor 4 lower frequency bound Factor 100 better narrow-band NS Binaries: q q q Ø Initial LIGO: ~20 Mpc Ø Adv LIGO: ~350 Mpc BH Binaries: q Ø Initial LIGO: 10 Mo, 100 Mpc Ø Adv LIGO : 50 Mo, z=2 q Known Pulsars: q Stochastic background: Ø Initial LIGO: e = 3 x 10 -6 Ø Adv LIGO e = 2 x 10 -8 0 >> Initial LIGO: Ω~3 x 10 -6 >> Adv LIGO: Ω~ 3 x 10 -9 40 Hz 1 G 030488 -00 -M LIGO Scientific Collaboration 3

Anatomy of the projected Adv LIGO detector performance 10 -21 q Newtonian background, estimate

Anatomy of the projected Adv LIGO detector performance 10 -21 q Newtonian background, estimate for LIGO sites q Seismic ‘cutoff’ at 10 Hz q Suspension thermal noise q Test mass thermal noise q Unified quantum noise dominates at most frequencies for full power, broadband tuning q 10 -22 Initial LIGO 10 -23 Advanced LIGO NS-NS Tuning 10 -24 10 Hz 100 Hz 1 k. Hz Advanced LIGO's Fabry-Perot Michelson Interferometer is a platform for currently envisaged enhancements to this detector architecture (e. g. , flat-top beams; squeezing; background suppression) LIGO Scientific. Newtonian Collaboration G 030488 -00 -M 4

Design features 40 KG SAPPHIRE TEST MASSES ACTIVE ISOLATION QUAD SILICA SUSPENSION 180 W

Design features 40 KG SAPPHIRE TEST MASSES ACTIVE ISOLATION QUAD SILICA SUSPENSION 180 W LASER, MODULATION SYSTEM PRM BS ITM ETM SRM PD Power Recycling Mirror Beam Splitter Input Test Mass End Test Mass Signal Recycling Mirror Photodiode LIGO Scientific Collaboration G 030488 -00 -M 5

Pre-stabilized Laser q Require the maximum power compatible with optical materials Ø 180 W

Pre-stabilized Laser q Require the maximum power compatible with optical materials Ø 180 W 1064 nm Nd: YAG Ø Baseline design continuing with end-pumped rod oscillator, injection locked to an NPRO Ø 2003: Prototyping well advanced – ½ of Slave system has developed 100 W output f QR NPRO f FI BP FI f QR HR@1064 HT@808 f modemaching optics f 2 f f YAG / Nd: YAG / YAG 3 x 7 x 40 x 7 High Power Slave LIGO Scientific Collaboration G 030488 -00 -M EOM YAG / Nd: YAG 3 x 2 x 6 BP 20 W Master 6

Input Optics q q q Provides phase modulation for length, angle control (Pound-Drever-Hall) Stabilizes

Input Optics q q q Provides phase modulation for length, angle control (Pound-Drever-Hall) Stabilizes beam position, frequency with suspended mode-cleaner cavity Intensity stabilization to in-vacuum photodiode, 2 x 10 -9 ΔP/P at 10 Hz required (1 x 10 -8 at 10 Hz demonstrated) Design similar to initial LIGO but 20 x higher power Challenges: Ø Modulators Ø Faraday Isolators LIGO Scientific Collaboration G 030488 -00 -M 7

Test Masses / Core Optics q Absolutely central mechanical and optical element in the

Test Masses / Core Optics q Absolutely central mechanical and optical element in the detector Ø 830 k. W; <1 ppm loss; <20 ppm scatter Ø 2 x 108 Q; 40 kg; 32 cm dia q q Sapphire is the baseline test mass/core optic material; development program underway Characterization by very active and broad LSC working group Low mechanical loss, high density, high thermal conductivity all desirable attributes of sapphire Fused silica remains a viable fallback option Full-size Advanced LIGO sapphire substrate LIGO Scientific Collaboration G 030488 -00 -M 8

Core Optics Compensation Polish q Fabrication of Sapphire: Ø 4 full-size Advanced LIGO boules

Core Optics Compensation Polish q Fabrication of Sapphire: Ø 4 full-size Advanced LIGO boules grown (Crystal Systems); 31. 4 x 13 cm; two acquired q Mechanical losses: requirement met Ø recently measured at 200 million (uncoated) q Bulk Homogeneity: requirement met Ø Sapphire as delivered has 50 nm-rms distortion Ø Goodrich 10 nm-rms compensation polish q before Polishing technology: Ø CSIRO has polished a 15 cm diam sapphire piece: 1. 0 nm-rms uniformity over central 120 mm (requirement is 0. 75 nm) q Bulk Absorption: Ø Uniformity needs work Ø Average level ~60 ppm, 40 ppm desired LIGO Scientific Collaboration Ø Annealing shown to reduce losses G 030488 -00 -M after 9

Test Mass Coatings q q q q Optical absorption (~0. 5 ppm), Required scatter

Test Mass Coatings q q q q Optical absorption (~0. 5 ppm), Required scatter meet requirements for coating (good) conventional coatings Thermal noise due to coating mechanical loss recognized; program put in motion to develop low-loss coatings Ta 2 O 5 identified as principal source of loss Test coatings show somewhat reduced loss Standard Ø Alumina/Tantala coating Ø Doped Silica/Tantala Need ~5 x reduction in loss to make compromise to performance minimal Expanding the coating development program First to-be-installed coatings needed in ~2. 5 years – sets the time scale LIGO Scientific Collaboration G 030488 -00 -M 10

Active Thermal Compensation q q q Removes excess ‘focus’ due to absorption in coating,

Active Thermal Compensation q q q Removes excess ‘focus’ due to absorption in coating, substrate Allows optics to be used at all input powers Initial R&D successfully completed q Shielded ring compensator test 20 nm LIGO Scientific Collaboration G 030488 -00 -M ITM SRM Optical path distortion q Sophisticated thermal model (‘Melody’) developed to calculate needs and solution Gingin facility (ACIGA) readying tests with Lab suspensions, optics Application to initial LIGO in preparation Compensation Plates PRM Ø Ryan Lawrence MIT Ph. D thesis Ø Quasi-static ring-shaped additional heating Ø Scan to complement irregular absorption q ITM 0 5 mm 10 11 15

Isolation: Requirements q Render seismic noise a negligible limitation to GW searches Ø Newtonian

Isolation: Requirements q Render seismic noise a negligible limitation to GW searches Ø Newtonian background will dominate for frequencies less than ~15 Hz Ø Suspension and isolation contribute to attenuation q Reduce or eliminate actuation on test masses Ø Actuation source of direct noise, also increases thermal noise Ø Acquisition challenge greatly reduced Ø In-lock (detection mode) control system challenge is also reduced Seismic contribution LIGO Scientific Collaboration G 030488 -00 -M Newtonian background 12

Isolation: Pre-Isolator q External stage of low-frequency pre-isolation ( ~1 Hz) Ø Tidal, microseismic

Isolation: Pre-Isolator q External stage of low-frequency pre-isolation ( ~1 Hz) Ø Tidal, microseismic peak reduction Ø DC Alignment/position control and offload from the suspensions Ø 1 mm pp range q q Lead at Stanford Prototypes in test and evaluation at MIT for early deployment at Livingston in order to reduce the cultural noise impact on initial LIGO Ø System performance exceeds Advanced LIGO requirements LIGO Scientific Collaboration G 030488 -00 -M 13

Isolation: Two-stage platform q Choose an active approach: Ø high-gain servo systems, two stages

Isolation: Two-stage platform q Choose an active approach: Ø high-gain servo systems, two stages of 6 degree-of-freedom each Ø Allows extensive tuning of system after installation, operational modes Ø Dynamics decoupled from suspension systems q q Lead at LSU Stanford Engineering Test Facility Prototype fabricated Ø Mechanical system complete Ø Instrumentation being installed Ø First measurements indicate excellent actuator – structure alignment LIGO Scientific Collaboration G 030488 -00 -M 14

Suspensions: Test Mass Quads q q Adopt GEO 600 monolithic suspension assembly Requirements: Ø

Suspensions: Test Mass Quads q q Adopt GEO 600 monolithic suspension assembly Requirements: Ø minimize suspension thermal noise Ø Complement seismic isolation Ø Provide actuation hierarchy q Quadruple pendulum design chosen Ø Fused silica fibers, bonded to test mass Ø Leaf springs (VIRGO origin) for vertical compliance q Success of GEO 600 a significant comfort Ø 2002: All fused silica suspensions installed q PPARC funding approved: significant financial, technical contribution; quad suspensions, electronics, and some sapphire substrates Ø U Glasgow, Birmingham, Rutherford Ø Quad lead in UK LIGO Scientific Collaboration G 030488 -00 -M 15

GW readout, Systems q Signal recycled Michelson Fabry-Perot Ø Offers flexibility in instrument response,

GW readout, Systems q Signal recycled Michelson Fabry-Perot Ø Offers flexibility in instrument response, optimization for technical noises, sources Ø Can also provide narrowband response – ~10 -24/Hz 1/2 up to ~2 k. Hz Ø Critical advantage: can distribute optical power in interferometer as desired q q q High-frequency narrowbanding Thermal noise Three table-top prototypes give direction for sensing, locking system Glasgow 10 m prototype: control matrix elements confirmed Readout choice – DC rather than RF for GW sensing Ø Offset ~ 1 picometer from interferometer dark fringe Ø Best SNR, simplifies laser, photodetection requirements q Caltech 40 m prototype in construction, early testing Ø Complete end-to-end test of readout, controls, data acquisition LIGO Scientific Collaboration G 030488 -00 -M Low-frequency optimization 16

Upgrade of all three interferometers q In discovery phase, tune all three to broadband

Upgrade of all three interferometers q In discovery phase, tune all three to broadband curve Ø 3 interferometers nearly doubles the event rate over 2 interferometers Ø Improves non-Gaussian statistics Ø Commissioning on other LHO IFO while observing with LHO-LLO pair q In observation phase, the same IFO configuration can be tuned to increase low or high frequency sensitivity Ø sub-micron shift in the operating point of one mirror suffices Ø third IFO could e. g. , v observe with a narrow-band VIRGO v focus alone on a known-frequency periodic source v focus on a narrow frequency band associated with a coalescence, or BH ringing of an inspiral detected by other two IFOs LIGO Scientific Collaboration G 030488 -00 -M 17

Baseline plan q Initial LIGO Observation at design sensitivity 2004 – 2006 Ø Significant

Baseline plan q Initial LIGO Observation at design sensitivity 2004 – 2006 Ø Significant observation within LIGO Observatory Ø Significant networked observation with GEO, VIRGO, TAMA q Structured R&D program to develop technologies Ø Conceptual design developed by LSC in 1998 Ø Cooperative Agreement carries R&D to Final Design Now: Proposal is for fabrication, installation positively reviewed “…process leading to construction should proceed” Proposed start 2005 q q Ø Sapphire Test Mass material, seismic isolation fabrication Ø Prepare a ‘stock’ of equipment for minimum downtime, rapid installation q Start installation in 2007 Ø Baseline is a staggered installation, Livingston and then Hanford q q Coincident observations by 2010 Optimism for networked observation with other ‘ 2 nd generation’ instruments LIGO Scientific Collaboration G 030488 -00 -M 18

Advanced LIGO q q q Initial instruments, data helping to establish the field of

Advanced LIGO q q q Initial instruments, data helping to establish the field of interferometric GW detection Advanced LIGO promises exciting astrophysics Substantial progress in R&D, design Still a few good problems to solve A broad community effort, international support Advanced LIGO will play an important role in leading the field to LIGO Scientific Collaboration G 030488 -00 -M 19