Advance evidence collection and analysis of web browser

Advance evidence collection and analysis of web browser activity by Junhoon Oh David Rivera 11/7/2013 Digital Forensics

Introduction • • • Introduction to web browser forensics Related Research Advance evidence analysis Web Browser Forensic Analyzer(WEFA) Tool WEFA Compared to existing tools Conclusions

Web Browser Forensics • • Everyone uses Web Browsers to surf the internet (even criminals) Important evidence could be collected from a web browser such as: o o Cache History Cookies Download List ● There are research studies and tools for the aid of Web browser log file analysis

Problems with Web Browser Forensics • • Tools and Studies are targeted to specific Web browsers or log file types Large availability of Web browsers Each Browser creates several types of log files that must be examined Current Research and tools remain at the level of simple parsing

New evidence collection and analysis methodology Paper suggests that the following 5 requirements are essential when performing Web browser analysis: 1. Integrated analysis of multiple Web browsers 2. Timeline analysis 3. Extraction of significant information related to digital forensics 4. Decoding encoded words at a particular URL 5. Recovery of deleted Web browser information

Related Research • • • Web browser forensics research and tools are targeted to specific browsers or structural analysis of a single type of log file Even if tools support integrated analysis of multiple Web browsers, they rely on parsing to process and analyze log files This limits their effectiveness in an investigation

Advance Evidence Analysis ● Integrated Search ○ Examine all Web browsers ○ Preform Integrated Analysis ● Timeline analysis ○ Each Web browser employs a different time format ○ Time zones must be taken into consideration in order to convert timestamps to the exact local time

Advance Evidence Analysis cont. • Search history o Search words used in search engines § Saved in HTTP URL § Different Search Engines use different HTTP URL format o Using the similarities observed from the table this method can be applied to unknown HTTP URL

Advance Evidence Analysis cont. • URL encoding o Encoding is used when words are not in English o Investigator needs to apply appropriate decoding method to find meaning of the encoded words o There are several types of encoding: § UTF-8 § Unicode § DBCS ● User Activity ○ Determining suspects activities may take too much time ○ Using keywords can be used to help speed up the process

Advance Evidence Analysis cont. ● Recovery of Deleted Information ○ Browsers use two different methods for erasing log information ■ Reinitializing/Overwriting log data ● This will make it impossible to recover original data ● Session information can be used to partially recover deleted history ■ File Deletion ● Traditional file deletion techniques can be used to recover deleted files before their metadata is overwritten by the OS ● Carving method can also be used to recover files that are located in unallocated space because of the way Web browsers save their log files

WEFA Tool

WEFA Tool cont.

WEFA Compared to Existing Tools • • Existing tools were tested to compare them with WEFA features Results showed that current tools lack important features o Support all log file formats o Search Word Extraction o URL parameter analysis

Conclusion • • Tracking evidence from a Web browser is an important part of the Digital Forensics Process WEFA tool provides a step forward towards the digital forensics analysis of Web browsers There needs to be more research on different environments such as Linux, Mac and Mobile devices Intentional log file tampering is not taken into consideration