Addressing the challenges of deforestation and forest degradation

  • Slides: 19
Download presentation
‘Addressing the challenges of deforestation and forest degradation to tackle climate change and biodiversity

‘Addressing the challenges of deforestation and forest degradation to tackle climate change and biodiversity loss’ - Bonn, 31 March 2009 Valérie Merckx European Commission DG Environment

Context • Deforestation contributes to around 20% of CO 2 emissions (5, 8 Gt.

Context • Deforestation contributes to around 20% of CO 2 emissions (5, 8 Gt. CO 2) • More than total EU-27 greenhouse gas emissions (5, 1 Gt. CO 2/yr) Limiting climate change to 2°C can not be achieved without action on deforestation.

Context • Deforestation is one of the main cause of biodiversity loss • 1,

Context • Deforestation is one of the main cause of biodiversity loss • 1, 6 billion people depend on forest resources and 60 million indigenous people depend directly on forests for their survival.

The challenge • Each year 13 million hectares of forests are lost (FAO 2005).

The challenge • Each year 13 million hectares of forests are lost (FAO 2005). • 96% of the recent deforestation occurs in tropical regions.

Deforestation is not new … What is new is: • The link to the

Deforestation is not new … What is new is: • The link to the climate change debate • The recognition that incentives are needed to counterbalance the economic drivers of deforestation

The policy frame Ongoing international negotiations on climate change (UNFCCC) but the benefits of

The policy frame Ongoing international negotiations on climate change (UNFCCC) but the benefits of a successful implementation will not be limited to climate change mitigation

A triple win is possible Successful global actions to stop deforestation will contribute to:

A triple win is possible Successful global actions to stop deforestation will contribute to: • Climate change mitigation • Biodiversity conservation • Poverty alleviation

The objectives • To halt global forest cover loss by 2030 at the latest

The objectives • To halt global forest cover loss by 2030 at the latest • To reduce gross tropical deforestation by at least 50% by 2020 compared to current levels

Areas for action • Strengthening forest governance and institutions at local and national level

Areas for action • Strengthening forest governance and institutions at local and national level = a pre-condition for effective policy answers • Capturing the economic value and rewarding forest ecosystem services; • Ensuring policy coherence ie address the impacts of the demand side • Using the UNFCCC forum to build a global response (with relevant input from CBD and other processes) • Improving quality of information forest monitoring and assessment.

The costs • € 15 – 25 billion/yr will be needed to halve deforestation

The costs • € 15 – 25 billion/yr will be needed to halve deforestation by 2020 • Resources need to be allocated by developed countries to complement efforts made by developing countries

The Global Forest Carbon Mechanism A financial mechanism under the UNFCCC to reward emission

The Global Forest Carbon Mechanism A financial mechanism under the UNFCCC to reward emission reductions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries

How to make the GFCM work? • Focus on reducing deforestation and forest degradation

How to make the GFCM work? • Focus on reducing deforestation and forest degradation while promoting the conservation, sustainable forest management and enhancement of forest carbon stocks • Contribute to protection of biodiversity and the fight against poverty • Performance based financial support, taking into account respective capabilities • Effective forest governance structures in place • Support for capacity-building • Nationwide implementation to minimise risk of leakage • Monitoring and accounting at national level, with independent verification of emission reductions achieved

REDD in the carbon market? Pre-conditions § - International agreement with ambitious mid-term emission

REDD in the carbon market? Pre-conditions § - International agreement with ambitious mid-term emission reduction commitments for balanced supply and demand • - Impact of reduced deforestation on carbon emissions properly monitored and verified • - Move from project level to national baselines to avoid leakage (solve methodological problems defining baseline) • - Adequate solution to non permanence of forestry credits and liability issues

Carbon market contribution to combating deforestation • Proceeds of auctioned allowances in the EU

Carbon market contribution to combating deforestation • Proceeds of auctioned allowances in the EU ETS as main source of EU contribution to the GFCM in the short term: • Commission ETS review proposal: at least 20% of auctioning proceeds should be used to support climate objectives, including fighting deforestation • European Parliament proposal: “… it is essential that revenues from auctioning …be used to reduce deforestation and increase sustainable afforestation and reforestation”. “Consideration should be given to contributing to a dedicated fund” • Pilot phase to test inclusion of REDD in the carbon markets for government compliance

Carbon market contribution to combating deforestation In the longer term: • Potential recognition of

Carbon market contribution to combating deforestation In the longer term: • Potential recognition of forestry credits – incl. deforestation / REDD – for compliance in the EU ETS – Considered after a review of the pilot phase of using deforestation credits for government compliance – If satisfactory solutions to liability issue, monitoring and verification, and supply and demand balance are found.

A comprehensive policy approach – promote the consumption of sustainably produced timber ; –

A comprehensive policy approach – promote the consumption of sustainably produced timber ; – ensure that EU policies do not increase the pressure on the world's forests ; – fill the existing knowledge gaps.

In conclusion The EU proposal: • is a step on our way to Copenhagen

In conclusion The EU proposal: • is a step on our way to Copenhagen • proposes main lines for a comprehensive EU response • is a contribution to setting the foundations of a viable global response to deforestation

Thank you for your attention! http: //ec. europa. eu/environment/f orests/deforestation. htm Contact: valerie. merckx@ec.

Thank you for your attention! http: //ec. europa. eu/environment/f orests/deforestation. htm Contact: valerie. merckx@ec. europa. eu giuliana. torta@ec. europa. eu

More info on EU climate policy: http: //europa. eu. int/comm/environment/climat/home_en. htm

More info on EU climate policy: http: //europa. eu. int/comm/environment/climat/home_en. htm