Adam where art thou 1 1 Finding Adam

  • Slides: 19
Download presentation
“Adam, where art thou? ” 1

“Adam, where art thou? ” 1

1. Finding Adam in the Bible 1. Adam is a historical individual 2. Adam

1. Finding Adam in the Bible 1. Adam is a historical individual 2. Adam is the ancestor of all humanity 3. (1) and (2) matter 2

2. Not finding Adam in recent science (1) degree of similarity 3

2. Not finding Adam in recent science (1) degree of similarity 3

4

4

2. Not finding Adam in recent science (1) degree of similarity (2) type of

2. Not finding Adam in recent science (1) degree of similarity (2) type of similarity – pattern of shared ‘mistakes’ (3) original human population much larger than a single pair 5

3. So where can we find Adam? Three attempts to harmonise Adam and evolutionary

3. So where can we find Adam? Three attempts to harmonise Adam and evolutionary history: (1) old earth creationist (2) classic theistic evolution (3) accommodationist theistic evolution 6

Bible’s history evolutionary history 7

Bible’s history evolutionary history 7

Harmonising Adam and evolutionary history 1. Old earth creationism least satisfactory: ‘ad-hoc’ most biblical

Harmonising Adam and evolutionary history 1. Old earth creationism least satisfactory: ‘ad-hoc’ most biblical 2. Classic theistic evolution 3. Accommodationist TE most satisfactory: consistent least biblical

Adam can’t be found in evolutionary history (1) Specific scenarios are unworkable: - dating

Adam can’t be found in evolutionary history (1) Specific scenarios are unworkable: - dating Adam: 1 -200, 000 yrs ago 10, 000 yrs ago 9

Neanderthal burial 10

Neanderthal burial 10

Adam can’t be found in evolutionary history (1) Specific scenarios are unworkable: - dating

Adam can’t be found in evolutionary history (1) Specific scenarios are unworkable: - dating Adam: 1 -200, 000 yrs ago 10, 000 yrs ago - relationship with co-existing hominids 11

Adam can’t be found in evolutionary history (1) Specific scenarios are unworkable (2) Bible’s

Adam can’t be found in evolutionary history (1) Specific scenarios are unworkable (2) Bible’s story-line incompatible with evolutionary history - cross and resurrection - flood 12

Adam can’t be found in evolutionary history (1) Specific scenarios are unworkable (2) Bible’s

Adam can’t be found in evolutionary history (1) Specific scenarios are unworkable (2) Bible’s story-line incompatible with evolutionary history (3) The historical Adam vs a historical Adam 13

Adam will be found in a scientific model consistent with biblical history 14

Adam will be found in a scientific model consistent with biblical history 14

4. What if we can’t find Adam (yet)? • • • be comfortable with

4. What if we can’t find Adam (yet)? • • • be comfortable with not (yet) having an answer don’t ignore the evidence don’t rubbish the evidence or the scientists realise how little scientists know presuppositions limit the answers considered Proverbs 18 v 17 15

overturning models “The geosynclinal theory is one of the great unifying principles in geology.

overturning models “The geosynclinal theory is one of the great unifying principles in geology. In many ways its role in geology is similar to that of theory of evolution, which serves to integrate the many branches of the biological sciences…Just as the doctrine of evolution is universally accepted among biologists, so also the geosynclinal origin of the major mountain systems is an established principle in geology. ” Clark and Stearn, The geological evolution of North America, (1960) p 43. 16

Desert sand? “. . . the eolian, that is, wind-blown, nature of such sand

Desert sand? “. . . the eolian, that is, wind-blown, nature of such sand accumulations [e. g. the Coconino] is well founded. . The grains consist of resistant quartz. Less resistant mica grains and ultra-fine clay particles have been abraded to oblivion and/or wafted off-site by wind. ” D. A. Young and R. F. Stearley, The Bible, Rocks and Time, IVP, 2008, p. 305.

Conclusion We don’t need to rewrite our theology in the light of the findings

Conclusion We don’t need to rewrite our theology in the light of the findings of science 19