Actor Languages Maher Motivation Actor system Bill Communication

Actor Languages Maher – Motivation – Actor system Bill – – Communication mechanism Structure of Actor languages Act’s syntax and examples Actor-based languages Jack – SALSA – Mobile Agent – Conclusion

Actor Languages Maher Shinouda mshinoud@uwaterloo. ca

Objectives • • • Motivation Brief history What are actors Characteristics of actor-based languages Actor communication Events in actor languages Actor system Actor’s behavior Simple Example Actors VS Linda

Motivation • Develop language for concurrency “Parallel Execution of actions”. Concurrency in distributed systems exhibits: – Divergence – Deadlock – Mutual Exclusion

Brief History • A number of individuals have contributed to the development of the actor model. • Actor model was first described by Carl Hewitt (70’s) – The model was object-oriented: every object was a computationally active entity capable of receiving and reacting to messages. The Objects were called Actors. • Gul Agha, later develop the actor model and develop a mathematical theory of actors. • Actor languages can all trace its ancestor either directly or indirectly to Lisp.

What are Actors are independent concurrent objects that interact by sending asynchronous messages; each actor has its mail address and a behavior. An actor can do the following: • Send communication to other actors. • Create new actors. • Define a new behaviour for itself, which may be the same or different to its previous behaviour.

Three actions an actor may perform

What are Actors • Anatomy of Actor

Characteristics of Actor-based language • Encapsulation • All procedures and declarative information are encapsulated into a single entity “Actor”. • Actors share the main characteristics of objects in Simula and Smalltalk. • Actors considered to be Autonomous objects.

Characteristics of Actor-based language (Cont. ) • Inheritance • In OOP, Each object is related to a class and further more the class may be an object belonging to metaclass. • The notion of class is not integral to the actor model. • Inheritance in actors provide a conceptual organization of the system which is dynamically reconfigurable.

Characteristics of Actor-based language (Cont. ) Delegation • Sub-computation can be passed on by an actor to another actor which continue the processing. • Delegation promote modularity of the code. Concurrency • Actor language allow actors to specify a replacement which has 2 implications: – Capture history-sensitive information. – Allow for concurrent execution of expressions that don’t involve data dependency.

Actor Communication • Actor communicate using message passing only. • All communication is asynchronous. • Each Actor has mail address with mail queue. An actor may know the mail address because: – It has always know the address. – It received the address within a communication from another actor. – It created the address as part of creating another actor.

Actor communication (cont. ) A message (Task) is represented as 3 tuples: 1 - A tag which distinguish it from other tasks in the system. 2 - A target which is the mail address to which the communication is to be delivered. 3 - A communication which contain information which made available to the actor at the target.

Actor = Component • An actor is a special type of object that: Communicates with other actors by sending and receiving data via the mail address. • No shared state between actors. An actor may be described by specifying: • Its mail address with sufficiently large mail queue. • Behavior, which is a function of the communication accepted.

Event • What is event? An event cause a communication to be sent; or represent the processing of the communication. • Arrival order of events is nondeterministic. • Actor computation may be represented by event diagram.

Event Diagram

Actor System Group of actors within it and the set of tasks to be carried out. Two types of special actors needed: A • A receptionist: An actor which may receive communication from outside the system. C B • An external actor: Is one which is not in the system but its address is known to one or more actors within the system, allowing them to send communication.

The basic constructs A program in an actor language consists of: • behavior definitions: which simply associate a behavior schema with an identifier. • new expressions: which create actors. • Send commands: which create tasks.

The basic constructs (cont. ) • A receptionist declaration: which lists actors that may receive communications from the outside. • An external declaration: which lists actors that are not part of the system but to whom communications may be sent from the system.

Actor’s behavior The behavior of actor consists of three kind of actions: • Create actors with specified behavior. <new expression>: : = new<beh name> ({expr{, expr}*}) • Send message asynchronously to specified actor. <send command> : : = send<communication> to <target> • Become a new actor, assuming a new behavior to respond to the next message. become <expression>

Actor System (cont. ) Two important facts about mail system in the actor system: • Mail arrives in random, non deterministic order (asynchronous). Ensures concurrent execution. • The mail delivery is guaranteed. The system guarantee to execute all tasks eventually.

Simple Example actor Adder. And. Mutlipy (Double k) Double A, Double B ==> Double C: action [a], [b] ==> [c] with Double c: c: =k*(a+b): endaction endactor

Another Example actor Adder. And. Mutlipy 2[T] (T k) T A, T B ==> T C: action [a], [b] ==> [k*(a+b)]: endaction [a], [] ==> [k*a]: endaction [], [b] ==> [k*b]: endaction endactor

Actors VS Linda • Provide point-to-point communication and objectstyle encapsulation. • Provide pattern directed invocation • The locality property in actor: there is no way for an actor to contact other actors whose name hasn’t received in a previous communication. • Decoupled in both space and time: Information may be available so that any one can potentially access it. • Actors are components. • Linda doesn’t include the notion of component directly; nevertheless, the Tuple Space that it defines can be viewed as a generic connection component.

Manifold • Inter-process communication in MANIFOLD is asynchronous, using broadcast of events and a dynamic data-flow.

Actor Languages • Communication mechanisms • Structure of Actor Languages • Kernel language Act • Actor-based languages Lehui (Bill) Nie @ UW

Communication mechanisms • Actors are active objects which communicate by message passing • Asynchronous buffered communication – It's hard to imagine a reasonable system built on asynchronous, unbuffered communication. Too much would get lost.

Communication mechanisms • Communication is asynchronous, without any guaranteed arrival order. – Message order: if actor A sends a sequence of communications to actor B, then B may not receive them in the same order that A sent them. – It is possible for A to tag each message with a sequence number, so that B may rearrange messages into the correct order.

Communication mechanisms • Shared variables are not allowed in the actor model. – Shared variables means that they provide data transfer without any coordination mechanism or concurrency control. Variables sharing further complicates distribution and synchronization. – Latency and timing issues make it awkward to use shared variables in an asynchronous environment.

The Structure of Actor Languages

Control structure: recursive factorial computation • When actor factorial receives 3 and mail address c, it creates a new actor m, and sends itself the request to evaluate the factorial of 2 • When actor m receives a result, m multiplies 3 and the result and send to c • There is nothing inherently concurrent in the recursive algorithm to evaluate a factorial.

Comparison • Sequential language – Using a stack of activations. – No mechanism for distributing the work of computing a factorial or concurrently processing more than one request. • Actor-based language – Creating actors which waits for the appropriate communications. They are free to concurrently process the next communication. – Delegating most of the processing to a large number of actors. – Given a network of processors, an actor-based language could process a large number of requests much faster by simply distributing the actors it creates among these processors.

Join continuations: tree product • Divide and conquer concurrency can often be naturally expressed by using a functional form which evaluates its arguments concurrently. • Join continuation is used to synchronize the evaluation of the different arguments.

Tree product event diagram

Language Act • Act is a sufficient kernel for Act 3 • Syntax – <act program> : : = <behavior definition>* (<command>*) – <behavior definition> : : = (define (id {(with identifier <pattern>)}*) <communication handler>*) – <communication handler> : : = (Is-communication <pattern> do <command>*)

Language Act – <command> : : = <let command> | <conditional command> | <send command> | <become command> – <let command> : : = (let (<let binding>*) do <command>*) – <conditional command> : : = (if <expression> (then do <command>*) (else do <command>*)) – <send command> : : = (send <expression>) – <become command> : : = (become <expression>)

Example: Factorial c

Actor-based languages name origins notes PLASMA (1975) - The first actor language. Planner-like System Modeled on Actors. Originally called Planner-73, and implemented in Mac. Lisp-like syntax, but with several kinds of parentheses and brackets. "A PLASMA Primer", B. Smith et al, AI Lab Working Paper 92, MIT Oct 1975. "Viewing Control Structures as Patterns of Passing Messages", C. Hewitt, AI Lab Memo 410, MIT 1976. Act 1 (1981) Lisp Descendant of PLASMA. "Concurrent Object Oriented Programming in Act 1", H. Lieberman in Object Oriented Concurrent Programming, A. Yonezawa et al eds, MIT Press 1987. Written in LISP by Henry Liberman Act 3 (1985) (1987) Lisp Provides support for automatic generation of customers and for delegation and inheritance. "Linguistic Support of Receptionists for Shared Resources", Carl Hewitt et al in Seminar on Concurrency, S. D. Brookes et al eds, LNCS 197, Springer 1985, pp. 330 -359.

Actor-based languages name origins notes ABCL/1 (1987, 1990) Common LISP an extension of Common LISP An Object-Based Concurrent Language. Yonezawa, U Tokyo 1986. Language for the ABCL concurrent (MIMD) system. Asynchronous message passing to objects. Implementations in KCL and Symbolics LISP available from the author. "ABCL: An Object-Oriented Concurrent System", A. Yonezawa ed, MIT Press 1990. ftp: //camille. is. s. u-tokyo. ac. jp/pub/ info: email: matsu@is. s. u-tokyo. ac. jp ABCL/c+ (1988) C Concurrent object-oriented language, an extension of ABCL/1 based on C. "An Implementation of An Operating System Kernel using Concurrent Object Oriented Language ABCL/c+", N. Doi et al in ECOOP 88, S. Gjessing et al eds, LNCS 322, Springer 1988. Concurrent Aggregates (CA) (1990) - Concurrent object-oriented language based on the Actor model plus RPC. Pure object oriented, single inheritance, with first class selectors, continuations and messages. "Concurrent Aggregates: Supporting Modularity in Massively Parallel Programs", Andrew A. Chien. Compiler for CM 5 and workstations.

Actor-Based Concurrent Language (ABCL) • Message sending order from one object to another is preserved in ABCL. • Three types of message passing mechanisms – Past Non-blocking messages without a reply – Now Blocking messages with sender waiting for a reply – Future Non-blocking messages with a reply expected in the future

Concurrent Aggregates (CA) • Extends the Actor model with inheritance and aggregates • An aggregate is a group of actors of the same kind. All constituent actors share the same name. • A message sent to the aggregates is processed by one and only one constituent but which constituent receives the message is left unspecified (i. e. , one-to-one-of-many type of communication). • Unlike the Actor model, every message send in CA expects a reply by default.

Rosette • The most commercially successful actor-based language up to now • Used as a language for the interpreter of the extensible services switch in the Carnot project at Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation (MCC) • Continues to be used to provide heterogeneous interoperability for middleware in intranet and enterprise integration software • With Rosette, the object-oriented programming model and the concurrent execution model are combined to simplify the development of autonomous, distributed agents.

Active Object • Passive object oriented language – Separation of state (procedure and data) and thread manipulating that state • Active object oriented language – Encapsulation of state and thread – More appropriate for implementing concurrent and distributed systems

Actor Languages SALSA Mobile Agents What are Aglets? Conclusions Questions? Jack Chi@UW

Execution environment

Execution environment (cont. ) • The execution environment Application running on the Internet, or on limitedresource devices, need to adapt to changes in their execution environment at run-time. eg. db 2 get dbm cfg db 2 get db cfg

Problem • Current languages and systems fall short of enabling developers to migrate and reconfigure application sub-components at program-execution time. • Concurrent execution environment.

SALSA • Simple Actor Language, System and Architecture • Features: – Simplifies programming dynamically reconfigurable. Open application by providing universal name, active objects and migration. – Token-passing continuations, join continuations and first-class continuations.

Requirements • Internet and mobile computing place new demands on applications, which require them to be open and dynamically reconfigurable. • Java is popular today. • However, higher-level programming languages are required, in order for applications to be reconfigured, migrate to other platforms, and decomposed and re-composed arbitrarily.

SALSA • SALSA program can be easily preprocessed to Java and preserve Java’s useful objectoriented concepts.

A Hello. World program in SALSA Module helloworld Behavior Hello. World { void act(String arguments[]){ standard. Output <- print(“Hello “) @ standard. Output <- print(“World”); } }

A Hello. World program in SALSA (cont. ) • An arrow (<-) indicates message sending to an actor. • The at-sign (@) indicates a token-passing continuation. • SALSA programs are grouped into related behaviors, which are called modules. • A module can contain several interfaces and behaviors.

A Hello. World program in SALSA (cont. ) • A behavior can extend another behavior (Single inheritance) • Every behavior extends a top-level Universal. Actor behavior. • A SALSA behavior can implement zero or more interfaces (multiple interface inheritance)

Creating a Hello. World actor Hello. World helloworld = new Hello. World();

SALSA programs preprocessing SALSA Source code Program. salsa Program. java >>salsac Program. salsa SALSA actor library >>javac Program. java Program. class >>java Program JVM

Continuations In order to coordinate multiple actors, we introduce 3 types of continuations: • Token-passing continuations • Join continuations • First-class continuations

Token-passing continuations • Each message sent to an actor is equivalent to a method invocation in Java. • A token is essentially the return value of the previous method invocation. • An example a 1<-m 1(args)@a 2<-m 2(token)@a 3<-m 3(token)

Join continuations • A customer actor will receive an array with the tokens returned by multiple actors, once they have all finished processing their messages. join(a 1<-m 1, a 2<-m 2) @ (… other statements);

First class continuations • First-class continuations enable actors to delegate computation to a third party, independently of the context in which message processing is taking places.

Problem of Threads Communication Link

Internet computing/World Wide Computer

Internet computing/World Wide Computer • A WWC is a set of Virtual Machines, or Theaters. • A theater is associated with a UAL (Universal Actor Location) eg. rmsp: //wwc. aa. com/agent • An actor is bound to a UAN (Universal Actor Name) eg. uan: //wwc. travel. com/agent • RMSP stands for “remote message sending protocol” • Actors of WWC is similar to the mobile agents in many aspects.

Mobile Agent

Mobile Agent (cont. ) • A mobile agent is a program that can migrate from machine to machine in a heterogeneous network. • The program chooses when and where to migrate. It can suspend its execution at an arbitrary point, transport to another machine and resume execution on the new machine.

Mobile Agent vs Stationary agent • Mobile network agents are programs that can be dispatched from one computer and transported to a remote computer for execution.

7 good reasons to use mobile agents • • They reduce network load They overcome network latency They encapsulate protocols They execute asynchronously and autonomously. • They adapt dynamically. • They are naturally heterogeneous. • They are robust and fault-tolerant.

Java Mobile Agent • Why Java Mobile Agent? – Wide acceptance and popularity of Java technology. – Object serialized mechanism and security model enforced by the JVM. – Platform independence. Write once, run anywhere.

Aglets • Aglets are Java objects that can move from one host on the Internet to another. That is, an aglet that executes on one host can suddenly halt execution, dispatch itself to a remote host, and resume execution there. When the aglet moves, it takes along its program code as well as its data.

http: //aglets. sourceforge. net/ • • • Developed at IBM Tokyo Research Laboratory Aglets has become an open source project Current release is version 2. 0. 2 Can work with new Java 2 security model. Has been tested with JDK 1. 3. 1 Easy installation with ant (Java build tool) only 2 environment variables required.

Tahiti Server

Package structure • • • • com. ibm. aglet. event com. ibm. aglet. security com. ibm. aglet. system com. ibm. aglet. util com. ibm. aglets. security com. ibm. aglets. tahiti com. ibm. agletx. patterns com. ibm. agletx. util com. ibm. atp. auth com. ibm. awb. launcher com. ibm. awb. misc com. ibm. awb. weakref

Package structure (cont. ) • • • com. ibm. maf. atp com. ibm. maf. rmi com. ibm. net. protocol. atp com. ibm. net. protocol. rmi org. aglets. log. console org. aglets. log 4 j org. aglets. log. quiet

An Aglet class package auction; import com. ibm. aglet. *; import com. ibm. agletx. patterns. *; import java. util. *; import java. awt. *; import java. io. *; import java. net. *; public class My. Aglet extends Aglet { public void run() {} }

Aglets’ communications Message Aglet/App Message Proxy Reply Aglet Reply

Hosting of Incoming Aglets Network traffic Aglet Server Security Layer JVM Host Computer

Aglets versus applets • Both are mobile code. • A container is required before the code migration. • Life cycles are managed by a container. • Security is enfored by security manager. • Aglets carry their own states but applets usually do not.

Application - Auction Market Places

Interactions between Auctioneers & Bidders • Create auctioneers for certain number of auction market places. • Created 4 auctionners and move to their market places. • 10 bidders created to join bids in each market place. • Bidders post bids (thru sending messages to auctioneers) and/or move to the next market place. • Auctioneers notify the winners (sending messages back to bidders).

Demo

Conclusion • We think of components as composed of a collection of autonomous entities called actors. • They are objects: encapsulates methods, interface, data • They are autonomous: encapsulates a thread of control • They interact with each others and the environment by sending messages. • The ease with which actors can migrate makes them a natural model for mobile agents.

Questions?