Achieving Zero Waste with Plasma Arc Technology Louis

Achieving “Zero Waste” with Plasma Arc Technology Louis J. Circeo, Ph. D. Director, Plasma Applications Research Program Robert C. Martin, Jr. Michael E. Smith Electro-Optics, Environment and Materials Laboratory

Achieving “Zero Waste” Plasma arc technology offers a unique opportunity to achieve the “zero waste” goal by providing the capability to eliminate the need for land disposal of many hazardous wastes and to recover energy from municipal solid wastes and other organic wastes while producing salable byproducts and eliminating requirements for landfilling of ash or other residual materials.

What is PLASMA? • “Fourth State” of matter • Ionized gas at high temperature capable of conducting electrical current • Lightning is an example from nature

Non-transferred arc plasma torch In a plasma arc torch, the plasma gas serves as a resistive heating element to convert electricity into heat. Because it is a gas and cannot melt, temperatures in excess of 7000°C can be produced.

Plasma torch in operation

Characteristics of Plasma Arc Technology • Plasma acts as a resistive heating element that cannot melt and fail • Produces temperatures of 4, 000°C to over 7, 000°C • Torch power levels from 100 k. W to 200 MW produce high energy densities (up to 100 MW/m 3) • Torch operates with most gases – not a combustion process • Elimination of requirement for combustion air – Reduces gas volume requiring treatment – Reduces potential formation of complex organics (i. e. , dioxins and furans)

Plasma arc technology is ideally suited for waste treatment • Hazardous & toxic compounds broken down to elemental constituents by high temperatures • Organic materials – Pyrolyzed or volatilized – May be converted to fuel gases – Amenable to conventional off-gas treatment • Residual materials (radionuclides, heavy metals, etc. ) immobilized in a rock-like vitrified mass which is highly resistant to leaching

Plasma arc technology remediation experience • • • Heavy metals Radioactive wastes Industrial sludges Municipal solid waste Electric arc furnace dust Liquid/solid organic wastes • • • PCB’s Asbestos Chemical wastes Medical wastes Plastics Used tires

Waste Processing Applications of Plasma Arc Technology Waste Destruction Energy/Material Recovery

Waste Destruction Applications • Melting and vitrification of inorganic materials • Pyrolysis of organic materials – Molten metal or glass bath provides heat transfer – Heat causes breakdown of complex materials into elemental components – Rapid quenching prevents complex compound formation (dioxins and furans) – Water gas shift reaction to remove carbon • C + H 2 O → H 2 + CO – Gaseous products are fuel and simple acid gases – Vitreous residue is resistant to leaching – suitable for aggregate

U. S. asbestos stockpile disposal

French Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) disposal system

Incinerator ash disposal

Navy shipboard system

Navy Shipboard System – cont’d

Recent Commercial Applications • Mixed waste treatment facility-Richland, WA – Allied Technology Group (ATG) • Medical waste vitrification facility-Honolulu, HI – Asia Pacific Environmental Technologies (APET) • Incinerator ash vitrification facilities – Europe and Japan – Europlasma – IHI Inc. /Westinghouse Plasma

Recent Do. D Plasma Furnace Applications • Plasma Arc Shipboard Waste Destruction System (PAWDS) • U. S. Navy Warships (NSWCCD) • Plasma Arc Hazardous Waste Treatment System (PAHWTS) • U. S. Naval Base, Norfolk, VA (Office of Naval Research, Environmentally Sound Ships Program) • Plasma Ordnance Demilitarization System (PODS) • Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane, IN (Defense Ammunition Center)

Recent Do. D Plasma Furnace Applications – cont’d • Plasma Waste Treatment System (Pyrotechnics and Energetics) • Hawthorne Army Ammunition Plant, NV (Armament Research and Development Engineering Center) • Plasma Energy Pyrolysis System (PEPS) Demonstration Facility (Medical Waste and Blast Media), Lorton, VA • U. S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (CERL) • Mobile PEPS Demonstration System, U. S. Army CERL

Mobile Plasma Energy Pyrolysis System (PEPS)

Ga. Tech Plasma Waste Processing & Demonstration System • • • Developed by USACERL Congressional funding Cost ~$6 Million Capacity 10 tons/day Complete system – – – Feed & Tapping Furnace Emissions control Wastewater treatment 1 MW mobile generator

Georgia Tech Plasma Waste Processing and Demonstration System

Plasma Processing for Energy and Materials Recovery • Research on waste destruction noted that pyrolysis produced useful fuel gases and inert residuals from organic wastes including MSW • Relatively high plasma energy requirements (~600 k. Wh/ton) and capital cost of complex molten bath reactors limited economic feasibility of pyrolysis processes • Use of gasification technology has made plasma a more economically attractive alternative

Plasma Pyrolysis of MSW Gas Heating Value Output Electricity Input Steam Negligible = 4. 30 Gas Heat Energy 1. 05 MBtu MSW Product Gas PLASMA 1 Ton – 9. 39 Mbtu 33% Moisture 30, 300 SCF Heating Value = 8. 16 MBTU GASIFIER Lo s 1. 77 Electricity 0. 56 MWHr – 1. 90 MBtu M se s B tu Based on data from Resorption Canada, Ltd. 1995 (Summarized and converted to English units)

Hitachi Metals Plasma MSW System – Japan Coke and Limestone Plasma Torch Metal Slag Excess Heat Utilization & Power Generation

Hitachi Metals 200 TPD MSW Plant - Utashinai Japan

Hitachi Metals Utashinai, Japan Plant Commercial 200 ton/day plasma processing system • Designed for Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) and Automobile Shredder Residue (ASR) – Represents MSW from approximately 30, 000 US households • Plant has two plasma reactors – Four 300 k. W torches (Westinghouse Plasma Corp. ) per reactor – Each reactor will process ~4 tons/hr • Generates 7. 9 MW of electricity (4. 3 MW to grid) – Could supply 4, 000 US households with electricity (up to 15% of households supplying waste to the system) • Fully operational in April 2003

Vitrified MSW residue

Leachability of Vitrified MSW Residue (TCLP) Metal Permissible concentration (mg/l) Measured Concentration (mg/l) Arsenic 5. 0 <0. 1 Barium 100. 0 <0. 5 Cadmium 1. 0 <0. 02 Chromium 5. 0 <0. 2 Lead 5. 0 <0. 2 Mercury 0. 2 <0. 01 Selenium 1. 0 <0. 1 Silver 5. 0 <0. 5

MSW Solid Byproduct Uses Molten Stream Processing (Product) Salable Product Uses Air Cooling Coarse Aggregate (roads, concrete, asphalt) (Gravel) Water Cooling (Sand) Fine Aggregate (concrete, asphalt, concrete products) Water Cooling Recyclable metals (Metal Nodules) Air Blown (“Rock Wool”) Insulation, sound proofing, agriculture

PLASMA PROCESSING OF MSW AT COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS Concept • • • Collocate MSW plasma processing plants (in modules of 1, 000 TPD) with existing operational coal-fired power plants. The amount of coal supplied to a plant will be reduced, proportionate to thermal output of the MSW plant. The hot gaseous emissions from the plasma plant afterburner system will be fed directly into the coal plant combustion chamber to supplement the combusted coal gases. The combined plasma and coal gaseous emissions would produce steam and power equal to the normal coal plant generating capacity. MSW would replace large volumes of coal for power generation in a very efficient, cost-effective and environmentally cleaner operation.

PLASMA PROCESSING OF MSW AT COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS Reduced Capital Costs of MSW Plant(1) • Use existing power plant facilities – Steam generation system – Off gas treatment system – Electrical generating system • Use existing transportation network • Build on power plant land, if feasible (1) Geoplasma, LLC estimated costs

PLASMA PROCESSING OF MSW AT COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS Summary By 2020, if all MSW was processed by plasma at coal-fired power plants (1 million TPD), MSW could: • • • Supply about 5% of U. S. electricity needs Replace about 140 million TPY of coal Eliminate about 15 million TPY of coal ash going to landfills Provide significantly cleaner coal plant air emissions Support the goals of the Clear Skies Act

YEAR 2020 SELECTED RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES Source Quads (1015 BTU) Plasma Processed MSW(1) Geothermal(2) 0. 47 Landfill Gas(2) 0. 12 Solar(2) 0. 09 Wind(2) 0. 04 ___________ (1) Assumes 1 million TPD (2) Extrapolated from 1999 statistics 0. 90

Capital Costs: Incineration vs Plasma Gasification Facilities (Note: Plasma Costs are Geoplasma LLC Estimates)

Potential Do. D Applications • Processing of hazardous wastes – Major installations – Industrial activities (depots, Air Force Plants) • “Bare Base” and “Zero Footprint” Operations – Process solid and sanitary wastes – Eliminate landfill or shipping of residuals – Recovery of energy as steam or hot water

Barriers to implementation of Plasma Arc Technology • Successful commercial applications in US • Regulatory acceptance and permitting • Public acceptance

For More Information: • Contact: – Lou Circeo: lou. circeo@gtri. gatech. edu (404 -894 -2070) – Bob Martin: bob. martin@gtri. gatech. edu (404 -894 -8446) – Mike Smith: mike. smith@gtri. gatech. edu – (404 -894 -0281) Georgia Tech Research Institute EOEML/SHETD/ETB 430 Tenth Street NW Atlanta, GA 30332 -0837