Accelerated Data Program ADP The ADP Team PARIS

  • Slides: 18
Download presentation
Accelerated Data Program ADP The ADP Team PARIS 21 Steering Committee, 14 November 2007

Accelerated Data Program ADP The ADP Team PARIS 21 Steering Committee, 14 November 2007

Rationale Why can’t we better measure and monitor results? 3 issues : 1 Existing

Rationale Why can’t we better measure and monitor results? 3 issues : 1 Existing data are not always fully exploited 2 Methods and concepts are not harmonized 3 Scope, timeliness and frequency are not optimal

Goal and Objectives To strengthen country capacity in producing statistical data relevant for policy

Goal and Objectives To strengthen country capacity in producing statistical data relevant for policy design, monitoring and evaluation, by : 1 Better documenting, preserving, and disseminating existing microdata 2 Better exploiting existing datasets (quality assessments, further analysis) 3 Better strategizing and aligning survey programs and statistical outputs to priority data needs

Implementation: Pilot Countries

Implementation: Pilot Countries

Implementation: Pilot Countries Africa Asia Central and South America Middle-East Cameroon Congo (DR) Ethiopia

Implementation: Pilot Countries Africa Asia Central and South America Middle-East Cameroon Congo (DR) Ethiopia The Gambia Kenya Liberia Mali Mozambique Nigeria Senegal Uganda Bangladesh Fiji Indonesia Mongolia Philippines Sri Lanka Thailand Vietnam Guatemala Honduras Peru Yemen Expressed interest: Bolivia, Colombia, Guinea, Guyana, Mexico, Panama, Palestine

Implementation: Partners Core partners • PARIS 21 Secretariat • World Bank • International Household

Implementation: Partners Core partners • PARIS 21 Secretariat • World Bank • International Household Survey Network (IHSN) Other international partners • • • Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF) Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (UN-ESCWA)* …

Implementation Based on Country demand Simplified and standardized for fast execution : • Initiation

Implementation Based on Country demand Simplified and standardized for fast execution : • Initiation – Request of participation from country • Preparation – Development of a country-specific ADP work program • Ideally: explicitly linked to the NSDS • Preferably : all key microdata producers involved • Implementation – Technical assistance, training, and financial support – Regular technical follow-up and supervision by the ADP team – Administrative modalities may vary from country to country • Evaluation (later)

Activities: Task 1 Documentation, preservation and dissemination of existing survey microdata • Complete inventory

Activities: Task 1 Documentation, preservation and dissemination of existing survey microdata • Complete inventory of existing microdata • Documentation of existing datasets following international standards/best practices • Definition of a microdata dissemination policy, in accordance with the national legislation • Anonymization of microdata • Establishment of national microdata archive

Activities: Task 1 Implementation Tools • • Microdata Management Toolkit (with related guidelines) Dissemination

Activities: Task 1 Implementation Tools • • Microdata Management Toolkit (with related guidelines) Dissemination of Microdata Files: Policy Guidelines * Anonymization tools * National Data Archive template Progress • Full support proposals implemented in 9 countries, 6 others being designed/adopted • Data inventories completed or underway in 15 countries • 250 staff trained on the Toolkit (50 institutions in 15 countries) • Surveys being Toolkited, dissemination policies being designed • National Data Archive being developed, first live in December

Activities: Task 1 Implementation Progress ? ‘Known surveys’ 60 are Best Estimates Available ?

Activities: Task 1 Implementation Progress ? ‘Known surveys’ 60 are Best Estimates Available ? 50 40 ? ? ? ? 30 Known Surveys Documented Publicized 20 10 0 Cameroon Ethiopia Mali Nigeria Uganda

Activities: Task 2 Analysis of existing survey data and assessment of the past survey

Activities: Task 2 Analysis of existing survey data and assessment of the past survey programs • Focuses on priority issues identified in PRSP and other sector strategies • Expected outputs : • detailed assessment of the weaknesses of data/survey instruments and improvement • analytical work and policy briefs

Activities: Task 2 T 1 shows the need to improve reliability Are you currently

Activities: Task 2 T 1 shows the need to improve reliability Are you currently attending school or, if school is not in session, did you attend school in the session just completed and plan to attend next session? 2004 HIS, Malawi Is school in session? Yes No Are you currently attending school? Yes Did you attend school last year? No No NO Yes Do you intend to attend school next year? No YES Yes

Activities: Task 2 T 1 shows the need for harmonization Measuring access to improved

Activities: Task 2 T 1 shows the need for harmonization Measuring access to improved water sources in Ghana CWIQ 2003 CENSUS 2000 GLSS 1998 DHS 2003

Activities: Task 2 Implementation Tools • Question-Bank, under development • Later, support to national

Activities: Task 2 Implementation Tools • Question-Bank, under development • Later, support to national question banks: – consistency between different national sources – reuse and harmonization of literal questions, enumerator instructions, response categories , etc. Progress • Identification of activities: dependent on country situation and priorities • ADP focus on T 2 will be increasing

Activities: Task 3 Development of improved survey program and data collection. Restricted to a

Activities: Task 3 Development of improved survey program and data collection. Restricted to a few countries (budget constraints) • Definition of more modular survey programs, aligned to clearly defined priorities • Data collection: complements other sources of funding Implementation: Tools • Survey Quality Assessment Framework * ; Question-Bank * Implementation: Progress • Niger: support for TA and data quality management • Haiti: upcoming

Implementation: Lessons learnt so far • Microdata production is huge and ‘hidden’ • Microdata

Implementation: Lessons learnt so far • Microdata production is huge and ‘hidden’ • Microdata dissemination is limited and mostly ad-hoc. Obstacles are : – Legal (confidentiality) and political – Financial (rarely budgeted by sponsors) – But also technical and “psychological” (Fear of contradiction, no incentive - feedback from users) • High demand from countries for: – Technical tools (Toolkit, NADA, anonymization) – Policy guidelines (confidentiality, dissemination, etc. ) – Training • Can have major impact on quality of future surveys • Need to work with users also (Task 2 and Task 3)

Implementation: Lessons learnt so far • Lots of positive externalities : – Enhance south-south

Implementation: Lessons learnt so far • Lots of positive externalities : – Enhance south-south cooperation (CMR->DRC, UGA->KEN RWA ) – System wide approach – NSDS implementation • Close link with other initiatives / programs : – Dev. Info – MECOVI – Regional Award for Innovation in Statistics for Latin America and the Caribbean (DFID/WB) – MICS program in 50 countries • Not expensive and doable • Constraint on country staff time • Growing demand from countries and interest from partners

Thank you www. surveynetwork. org/adp

Thank you www. surveynetwork. org/adp