ACC update Dr Kris Fernando ACC National Advisor

  • Slides: 13
Download presentation
ACC update Dr Kris Fernando. ACC National Advisor: Psychology and Mental Health April 2012

ACC update Dr Kris Fernando. ACC National Advisor: Psychology and Mental Health April 2012 Branch Advisory Psychologists

Topics to be Covered • Revised DATA Contract • Role of Branch Advisory Psychologists

Topics to be Covered • Revised DATA Contract • Role of Branch Advisory Psychologists • Symptom Validity

Revised DATA Contract • Choice of classification methods • Involvement of the treatment provider

Revised DATA Contract • Choice of classification methods • Involvement of the treatment provider at a variety of levels depending on client need • Causation ‘a substantial’ cause • 6 hours funding allocated for the assessment/report and an additional 2 hours available for complex cases – looking at this • Funding for TRR increased to 4 hours • No DATA – replaced by either TRR or IART • Impact on everyday functioning stressed.

Mental Injury Contract • Amalgamation of a number of assessment contracts • Three categories

Mental Injury Contract • Amalgamation of a number of assessment contracts • Three categories – MICPI, MICSA, WRMI • No significant change in assessor criteria – some flexibility (health, educational and counselling psychologists, psychotherapists) • At least 12 months away

Branch Advisory Psychologists • • • 9 working in physical injury 10 in Sensitive

Branch Advisory Psychologists • • • 9 working in physical injury 10 in Sensitive Claims (2 psychotherapists) All part-time 0. 4 -0. 8 ths Most do clinical work outside of their BAP work All highly skilled and experienced Previously contracted – now the majority are employed and moving towards more centralised management • Has enabled more of a team approach and increased consistency nationwide

Role of Branch Advisory Psychologists • Provide advice to Claims Management Staff on clinical

Role of Branch Advisory Psychologists • Provide advice to Claims Management Staff on clinical matters to facilitate recovery of clients • To educate providers as to ACC requirements • BAPs are now alerted when new providers come on board • Feedback to providers on their assessments and intervention reports • Identification of areas of strength and where improvements are required • ACC similarities and differences to the requirements of other organisations • The BAP is meant to be a colleague who can assist you with ACC requirements – smooth the path in working with ACC • KPI – Positive and constructive relationships with providers. • Provider Feedback questionnaire – please respond

Training/Supervision • • Yearly PD allowance Fortnightly teleconferences Monthly peer review consultation Annual Advisor’s

Training/Supervision • • Yearly PD allowance Fortnightly teleconferences Monthly peer review consultation Annual Advisor’s 2 -day conference Regional advisor’s meetings 2 -3 times a year Additional face to face meeting External supervision once a month

Symptom Validity DATA Contract ‘Note whether you have identified any inconsistencies in the information

Symptom Validity DATA Contract ‘Note whether you have identified any inconsistencies in the information obtained from the client, additional sources, and/or psychometric measures administered. ’ ‘If you identify any inconsistencies, please provide possible reasons for their occurrence. ’

Symptom Validity Cont…. • What is being asked for is consideration of whether symptom

Symptom Validity Cont…. • What is being asked for is consideration of whether symptom validity may be an issue • Not an in-depth assessment • Informed consent and good rapport/relationship essential. Discussion of issues prior to the assessment. • Comprehensive clinical interview, review of relevant previous assessments/reports, collateral information • Use of psychometric measures if familiar with the measures and competent with the interpretation • If issues around symptom validity are identified, provide some hypotheses and rationale as to possible reasons for symptom exaggeration/fabrication

Symptom Validity Cont Possible signs of issues around symptom validity • Unlikely symptoms or

Symptom Validity Cont Possible signs of issues around symptom validity • Unlikely symptoms or clinical course • Inconsistency of symptom presentation • Bizarre or unlikely symptoms • Atypical fluctuation in symptoms in response to external incentives • Unusual response to intervention • Markedly discrepant capacity for work versus recreation

Symptom Validity Cont … • Familiarity with the symptom validity literature • Supervision •

Symptom Validity Cont … • Familiarity with the symptom validity literature • Supervision • Careful documentation as to how you reached your conclusions and the rationale for your opinion • Provide hypotheses re why the client might be exaggerating/fabricating symptoms • State findings clearly using neutral language which is not derogatory • ACC will have an ongoing relationship with the client – need to work with the client re the identified SV issues and look to progress the client’s rehabilitation • Need to retain a respectful working relationship with clients.

ACC’s Responsibility • We need to be clearer as to what is required –

ACC’s Responsibility • We need to be clearer as to what is required – evolving over time • Need to ensure that the client is treated fairly and ethically • Need to have a collaborative approach with providers and the professional bodies • Written guidelines • More training for providers and internal staff – written guidelines • National Panel for complex cases

ACC Contracts available for Psychologists • Diagnostic and Treatment Assessment Services • Psychological Services

ACC Contracts available for Psychologists • Diagnostic and Treatment Assessment Services • Psychological Services – Assessment and treatment • Pain Management Psychological Services – Assessment and Treatment • Neuropsychological Assessment Service • Concussion Services. • Procurement Contact Person Karen. macguire@acc. co. nz