AASHTO Innovation Initiative Dave Huft SDDOT AASHTO Research

  • Slides: 20
Download presentation
AASHTO Innovation Initiative Dave Huft, SDDOT AASHTO Research Advisory Committee Wichita, KS, July 24,

AASHTO Innovation Initiative Dave Huft, SDDOT AASHTO Research Advisory Committee Wichita, KS, July 24, 2018

Origin of AII • Originally Technology Implementation Group • Post-SHRP 1 implementation effort •

Origin of AII • Originally Technology Implementation Group • Post-SHRP 1 implementation effort • 1 st meeting December, 2000 • Reported to Standing Committee on Highways • Immediate ties to RAC • Joe Denault, WV Chair 2

TIG Vision & Mission …a culture where rapid advancement and implementation of high payoff,

TIG Vision & Mission …a culture where rapid advancement and implementation of high payoff, innovative technologies is the expectation of the transportation community …to identify and champion the deployment and implementation of a select few ready-to-use technologies, products, or processes that are likely to yield significant benefits to the transportation 3

TIG Role in Innovation 4

TIG Role in Innovation 4

TIG Process • Identify & Solicit • Fund Outreach “Ready to Use” – Conferences

TIG Process • Identify & Solicit • Fund Outreach “Ready to Use” – Conferences Technologies – Showcases – Workshops • Select High-Payoff – Marketing Focus Technologies • Provide Leadership to – Brochures Promote & Support – Manuals – Multimedia Implementation – Webinars • Create Lead States Teams 5

Current Focus Technologies • Pedestrian Gateway Treatment • Wrong Way Driver (WWD) Detection Systems

Current Focus Technologies • Pedestrian Gateway Treatment • Wrong Way Driver (WWD) Detection Systems • Interactive Visualization • Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Strands • e-Construction • Project PS&E Collaborative Review • Watershed Resources Registry 6

AASHTO Innovation Initiative • Renamed May, 2014 • Not all innovation • SHRP 2

AASHTO Innovation Initiative • Renamed May, 2014 • Not all innovation • SHRP 2 comes from Implementation implementation • EDC of formal • STIC research 7

AII in New Committee Structure 8

AII in New Committee Structure 8

TIG Exec Committee Membership • Mark Van Port Fleet, MI • Dallas Hammit, AZ

TIG Exec Committee Membership • Mark Van Port Fleet, MI • Dallas Hammit, AZ • Binh Bui, GA • Tommy Nantung, IN • Chris Herrick, KS • Valerie Edgar, MD • Brian Thompson, PA • Dave Huft, SD • Shane Marshall, UT • Garrett Moore, VA • Chad Clawson, AASHTO • Thomas Harman, FHWA • Brian Roberts, NACE • Len Sanderson, PB • Mike Stenko, TRANSPO • Waseem Dekelbab, TRB 9

TIG Funding • AASHTO Technical Services Program – $6, 000/state – 37 states FY

TIG Funding • AASHTO Technical Services Program – $6, 000/state – 37 states FY 18 • FHWA – $200, 000 (as of May 2018) +Alaska

AII Roles EDC/STIC Support State Innovations • Suggest technologies • Evaluate STIC Award nominations

AII Roles EDC/STIC Support State Innovations • Suggest technologies • Evaluate STIC Award nominations • Apply lead state concept when appropriate • Solicit innovations from states (traditional role) 11

Technology Nomination Form 12

Technology Nomination Form 12

Proposed Role: Innovation Clearinghouse • Web-based, database driven tool • Active links to state

Proposed Role: Innovation Clearinghouse • Web-based, database driven tool • Active links to state and national websites of research & – Clearinghouse of innovative ideas business needs • DOTs • Community of • AASHTO Practice for • FHWA informal • TRB engagement ~40 innovation & 13 research staff so far

Proposed Role: Innovation Clearinghouse Unstructured List of Innovations from State DOT Users User Rating

Proposed Role: Innovation Clearinghouse Unstructured List of Innovations from State DOT Users User Rating Structured List of Innovations from AASHTO/TRB/DOTs Innovations from Domestic & International Scans Expert Review Unstructured List of Innovations from State DOT Users Innovation Clearinghouse Links to Business & Research Needs from State DOTs, FHWA, National Organizations 14

Innovation Community of Practice http: //www. intrans. iastate. edu/events/innovations/ 15

Innovation Community of Practice http: //www. intrans. iastate. edu/events/innovations/ 15

vs. or & Research Stereotype Innovation Stereotype • • Slow Methodical Incremental Expensive ?

vs. or & Research Stereotype Innovation Stereotype • • Slow Methodical Incremental Expensive ? Immediate Ingenious Revolutionary Cheap, cost-saving 16

Stereotypes Can Be Dangerous We Must Consider SD Pavement Examples • Value of Rigor

Stereotypes Can Be Dangerous We Must Consider SD Pavement Examples • Value of Rigor & Documentation • Long-Term Effects • Range of Conditions • Level of Risk • Full-Depth Asphalt • Thin Concrete • Lime Treated Base Do you remember “Ready-Fire-Aim”? 17

Questions for You • Which of AII’s proposed roles will serve your DOT? •

Questions for You • Which of AII’s proposed roles will serve your DOT? • What changes would you suggest to AII’s role? • How could AII better inform you? • How can AII actively engage more states? • Should RAC have a stronger role in AII? • How can Research and Innovation thrive in our DOTs? 18

Summary • AASHTO TIG and AII have supported innovation and implementation for 18 years

Summary • AASHTO TIG and AII have supported innovation and implementation for 18 years • Major changes in organization and role are in progress now • Now is a time of great – need – challenge – opportunity • RAC and your state can play in this game 19

Questions? • • • Dave Huft Research Program Manager South Dakota DOT 700 East

Questions? • • • Dave Huft Research Program Manager South Dakota DOT 700 East Broadway Avenue Pierre, SD 57501 -2586 Phone: 605. 773. 3358 Fax: 605. 773. 4870 dave. huft@state. sd. us http: //aii. transportation. org 20