A National Program Leaders Perspective on Developing National

  • Slides: 11
Download presentation
A National Program Leader’s Perspective on Developing National Outcomes and Indicators: 4 -H SET

A National Program Leader’s Perspective on Developing National Outcomes and Indicators: 4 -H SET Initiative Presented by Suzanne Le Menestrel, Ph. D. Evaluation 2009 November 13, 2009

4 -H Context • Public -private partnership • Nearly 6 million youth ages 5

4 -H Context • Public -private partnership • Nearly 6 million youth ages 5 -19 • Three national Mission Mandates – Science, Engineering, and Technology – Healthy Living – Citizenship

Why are Indicators Important? • PART/Portfolio Review-”Show Me the Data” • Public value of

Why are Indicators Important? • PART/Portfolio Review-”Show Me the Data” • Public value of 4 -H • Program Improvement

Steps to Identifying Indicators • Commissioned paper written by Dr. Ben Silliman, “Critical Indicators

Steps to Identifying Indicators • Commissioned paper written by Dr. Ben Silliman, “Critical Indicators of Youth Development Outcomes for 4 -H National Mission Mandates”: http: //www. national 4 hheadquarters. gov/library/Indicators_ 4 H_MM. pdf

Evaluation Goals • Track and monitor the implementation of 4 -H SET efforts at

Evaluation Goals • Track and monitor the implementation of 4 -H SET efforts at the state level • More fully understand the nature of promising and best program practices and how they can be replicated • More fully understand the impact that 4 -H SET efforts have on positive youth outcomes

Overview of 4 -H SET Evaluation Design

Overview of 4 -H SET Evaluation Design

Overview of Annual Youth Engagement, Attitudes and Knowledge Survey (YEAK) Goal: Obtain annual data

Overview of Annual Youth Engagement, Attitudes and Knowledge Survey (YEAK) Goal: Obtain annual data on 4 -H youth’s engagement, interest, attitudes, behaviors, knowledge, and educational and career aspirations. • Sample of youth ages 9 -18 from each of the five Extension regions • On-line and pencil and paper formats • Assess the short-term outcomes of the 4 -H SET Logic Model Informed by the domain frameworks outlined in current research

Developing the YEAK Survey • Created a matrix with all short-term indicators from logic

Developing the YEAK Survey • Created a matrix with all short-term indicators from logic model • Worked with national 4 -H SET Instrument Design Team to identify relevant reliable, valid measures for these indicators • Survey will be in the field shortly, pending IRB approval from participating universities (16 Land. Grant Universities)

Challenges/Lessons Learned/Wish List • • • Sampling Expense Institutionalization Disparate efforts Focus on the

Challenges/Lessons Learned/Wish List • • • Sampling Expense Institutionalization Disparate efforts Focus on the other national Mission Mandates

Contact Information Suzanne Le Menestrel slemenestrel@nifa. usda. gov 202 -720 -2297

Contact Information Suzanne Le Menestrel slemenestrel@nifa. usda. gov 202 -720 -2297