A Genetic Algorithm Tool for Designing Manufacturing Facilities






















- Slides: 22
A Genetic Algorithm Tool for Designing Manufacturing Facilities in the Capital Goods Industry Dr Christian Hicks, University of Newcastle, England Email: Chris. Hicks@ncl. ac. uk IGLS 02/1 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
Types of Facilities Design Problems • Green field – designer free to select processes, machines, transport, layout, building and infrastructure • Brown field – existing situation imposes many constraints IGLS 02/2 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
Facilities Layout Problem Includes: • Job assignment – selection of machines for each operation and definition of operation sequences • Cell formation – assignment of machine tools and product families to cells • Layout design – geometric design of manufacturing facilities and the location of resources • Transportation system design This paper considers cell formation and layout design IGLS 02/3 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
Cell Formation Methods • “Eyeballing” • Coding and classification • Product Flow Analysis • Machine-part incidence matrix methods – Rank Order Clustering – Close Neighbour Algorithm • Agglomerative clustering – Various similarity coefficients – Alternative clustering strategies IGLS 02/4 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
Rank Order Clustering Applied to data Obtained from a capital goods company IGLS 02/5 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
Similarity Coefficient IGLS 02/6 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
Agglomerative clustering using the single linkage strategy. Equation 1 IGLS 02/7 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
Agglomerative clustering with complete linkage strategy IGLS 02/8 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
Clustering applied to capital goods companies Limitations • Few natural machine-part clusters • Long and complex routings mitigate against self contained cells • Clustering only uses routing information • Geometric information is not used. IGLS 02/9 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
Genetic Algorithm Design Tool Based upon: • Manufacturing System Simulation Model (Hicks 1998) • GA scheduling tool (Pongcharoen et al. 2000) IGLS 02/10 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
IGLS 02/11 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
GA Procedure • Use GAs to create sequences of machines • Apply a placement algorithm to generate layout. • Measure total direct or rectilinear distance to evaluate the layout. IGLS 02/12 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
Genetic Algorithm Similar to Pongcharoen et al except, the repair process is different and it is implemented in Pascal IGLS 02/13 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
Placement Algorithm IGLS 02/14 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
Case Study • • • 52 Machine tools 3408 complex components 734 part types Complex product structures Total distance travelled – Direct distance 232 Km – Rectilinear distance 642 Km IGLS 02/15 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
Initial facilities layout IGLS 02/16 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
Total rectilinear distance travelled vs. generation (brown field) IGLS 02/17 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
Resultant Brown-field layout IGLS 02/18 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
Total rectilinear distance vs. generation (green field) Note the rapid convergence with lower totals than for the brown field problem IGLS 02/19 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
Resultant layout (green field) Note that brown field constraints, such as walls Have been ignored. IGLS 02/20 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
Conclusions • Significant body of research relating to facilities layout, particularly for job and flow shops. • Much research related to small problems. • Capital goods companies very complex due to complex routings and subsequent assembly requirements. • Clustering methods are generally inconclusive when applied to capital goods companies. • GA tool shows an improvement of 70% in the green field case and 30% in the brown field case. IGLS 02/21 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle
Future Work • The GA layout generation tool is embedded within a large sophisticated simulation model. • Dynamic layout evaluation criteria can be used. • The integration with a GA scheduling tool provides a mechanism for simultaneously “optimising” layout and schedules. IGLS 02/22 © C. Hicks, University of Newcastle