2015 English Indices of Deprivation South Devon and

  • Slides: 30
Download presentation
2015 English Indices of Deprivation – South Devon and Torbay CCG Contact: statistics@torbay. gov.

2015 English Indices of Deprivation – South Devon and Torbay CCG Contact: statistics@torbay. gov. uk Torbay Public Health

Overview • Background • How is the model built? • Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG)

Overview • Background • How is the model built? • Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) level deprivation • Neighbourhood level deprivation • Change overtime

Background • It’s the governments official measure of multiple deprivation • The Indices of

Background • It’s the governments official measure of multiple deprivation • The Indices of Deprivation 2015 provide a set of relative measures of deprivation for small areas (Lower-layer Super Output Areas) across England, based on seven different domains • The 2015 indices are the 4 th release at small area • A range of summary measures are available for higherlevel geographies including local authorities, local enterprise partnerships, and clinical commissioning groups

How is the model built? • The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) is a

How is the model built? • The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) is a weighted model across 7 domains • Income and Employment contribute almost half (45%) of the overall model

 • There are 37 indicators that are used within overall IMD and the

• There are 37 indicators that are used within overall IMD and the domains • Most of the data is taken from 2012/13

SUMMARIES TWO LEVELS Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) level Neighbourhood (LSOA) The deprivation indices are

SUMMARIES TWO LEVELS Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) level Neighbourhood (LSOA) The deprivation indices are published at different levels; the CCG level is presented first, followed by the neighbourhood…

How does South Devon & Torbay CCG compare? • South Devon and Torbay CCG

How does South Devon & Torbay CCG compare? • South Devon and Torbay CCG rank as: – 88 out of 209 Clinical Commissioning Group (Rank of 209) Health IMD - Rank of Deprivation average rank and Disability Lincolnshire East 49 51 Great Yarmouth and Waveney 52 59 ** South Devon and Torbay ** 88 93 Wyre Forest 96 122 North East Essex 99 88 Eastbourne, Hailsham and Seaford 123 120 North Derbyshire 132 98 South Worcestershire 139 146 Fylde & Wyre 141 67 West Cheshire 154 108 South Eastern Hampshire 165 137 Right. Care comparable CCGs

Relative CCG Position Interpreting the dials: • The dial represents the 209 CCGs in

Relative CCG Position Interpreting the dials: • The dial represents the 209 CCGs in England. • The dial segments represent CCGs by decile. • E. g. the red segments show the CCGs that rank amongst the 10% most deprived in England. • The orange pin marks SD&T CCGs position. • The grey pin marks Wyre Forest CCG position (Right. Care comparator – nearest IMD neighbour).

Relative CCG Position

Relative CCG Position

Neighbourhood level – CCG IMD Release Resident population in top 20% most deprived 2004

Neighbourhood level – CCG IMD Release Resident population in top 20% most deprived 2004 23, 2007 26, 200 2010 31, 100 2015 47, 100

Neighbourhood level - CCG IMD Release 2015 Resident population in top 20% most deprived

Neighbourhood level - CCG IMD Release 2015 Resident population in top 20% most deprived 47, 100 28 of 31 LSOAs across South Devon and Torbay in Top 20% most deprived are in Torbay

Index of Multiple Deprivation Areas in top 20% • 31 (20) LSOAs • 42,

Index of Multiple Deprivation Areas in top 20% • 31 (20) LSOAs • 42, 100 (15%) • Average • SD&T = 41. 6 years • England = 35. 5 years • Lowest rank • 219 (Roundham) • 6 areas in top 1, 000

Income Deprivation Areas in top 20% • 33 (22) LSOAs • 49, 500 (18%)

Income Deprivation Areas in top 20% • 33 (22) LSOAs • 49, 500 (18%) • Average • SD&T = 41. 3 years • England = 35. 5 years • Lowest rank • 708 (Roundham) • 2 areas in top 1, 000

Employment Deprivation Areas in top 20% • 44 (43) LSOAs • 66, 600 (24%)

Employment Deprivation Areas in top 20% • 44 (43) LSOAs • 66, 600 (24%) • Average • SD&T = 43. 1 years • England = 36. 5 years • Lowest rank • 233 (Roundham) • 8 areas in top 1, 000

Absolute v relative change There have been absolute improvements in some data, however faster

Absolute v relative change There have been absolute improvements in some data, however faster and larger improvements have taken place elsewhere; e. g. • Child poverty – absolute improvement, but relatively high levels remain • Annual gross pay – absolute improvement, but relatively low compared to other areas Further examples are presented on the following slide…

Additional income and employment context (CCG) Rate of employment support allowance claimants (16 -64

Additional income and employment context (CCG) Rate of employment support allowance claimants (16 -64 years) – support for people who are unable to work due to ill health or disability Rate of jobseekers allowance claimants (16 -64 years) – support for people who are unemployed but looking for employment Source: Department of Work and Pensions, Nomis

Additional Income and Employment (Torbay) Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, Median Annual pay

Additional Income and Employment (Torbay) Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, Median Annual pay – gross Source: ONS 2014 - 3 rd lowest in England Proportion of resident population aged 16 -64 claiming Jobseeker's Allowance Source: NOMIS Aug 2015 - highest in Region Workplace based GVA per head NUTS 3 at current basic prices Source: ONS table 3. 2 2013 - 5 th lowest in England Insolvency statistics: Debt relief orders rate of new cases per 10, 000 adult popn Source: gov. uk 2012 - highest rate in England

Health Deprivation and Disability Areas in top 20% • 35 (16) LSOAs • 51,

Health Deprivation and Disability Areas in top 20% • 35 (16) LSOAs • 51, 500 (19%) • Average • SD&T = 42. 7 years • England = 36. 8 years • Lowest rank • 613 (Tormohun) • 3 areas in top 1, 000

Underlying Health indicators

Underlying Health indicators

Underlying Health indicators

Underlying Health indicators

Education, Skills and Training Deprivation Areas in top 20% • 19 (20) LSOAs Resident

Education, Skills and Training Deprivation Areas in top 20% • 19 (20) LSOAs Resident • 27, 600 (10%) • Average • SD&T = 39. 9 years • England = 36. 3 years • Lowest rank • 854 (Watcombe) • 1 area in top 1, 000

Crime Deprivation Areas in top 20% • 28 (18) LSOAs • 42, 100 (15%)

Crime Deprivation Areas in top 20% • 28 (18) LSOAs • 42, 100 (15%) • Average • SD&T = 42. 3 years • England = 35. 6 years • Lowest rank • 19 (Wellswood) • 7 areas in top 1, 000

Barriers to Housing and Services Deprivation Areas in top 20% • 23 (30) LSOAs

Barriers to Housing and Services Deprivation Areas in top 20% • 23 (30) LSOAs • 36, 800 (14%) • Average • SD&T = 45. 8 years • England = 37. 8 years • Lowest rank • 168 (Moorland) • 4 areas in top 1, 000

Living Environment Deprivation Areas in top 20% • 57 (53) LSOAs • 88, 500

Living Environment Deprivation Areas in top 20% • 57 (53) LSOAs • 88, 500 (33%) • Average • SD&T = • England = 36. 8 years • Lowest rank • 223 (Ellacombe) • 13 areas in top 1, 000

Income Deprivation Affecting Children Areas in top 20% • 28 (16) LSOAs • 40,

Income Deprivation Affecting Children Areas in top 20% • 28 (16) LSOAs • 40, 600 (15%) • Average • SD&T = 40. 8 years • England = 35. 2 years • Lowest rank • 1, 076 (Watcombe) • 0 areas in top 1, 000

Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Areas in top 20% • 25 (20) LSOAs •

Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Areas in top 20% • 25 (20) LSOAs • 37, 100 (14%) • Average • SD&T = 40. 4 years • England = 34. 6 years • Lowest rank • 1, 128 (Watcombe) • 0 areas in top 1, 000

Change in count of CCG LSOAs in top 20% most Deprived Interpreting the chart

Change in count of CCG LSOAs in top 20% most Deprived Interpreting the chart • The darker circles represent the latest data; the lighter previous releases • The numbers at the bottom of the chart represent the count of areas in the top 20% most deprived in South Devon and Torbay over time • The red circles indicate what is driving the increase in multiple deprivation This shows that we have observed an increase in areas in top 20% most deprived

Widening inequalities in the CCG 2 communities that were ranked as in the 10+%

Widening inequalities in the CCG 2 communities that were ranked as in the 10+% to 20% most deprived in 2010 are now ranked in the top 10% most deprived in 2015 – these changes are shown in red ‘The poor are getting poorer’ 5 communities that were ranked as in the 60+% to 70% most deprived in 2010 are now ranked in the 70+% to 80% most deprived in 2015 – these changes are shown in green ‘The rich are getting richer’

Main Messages • South Devon and Torbay CCG is generally about average in terms

Main Messages • South Devon and Torbay CCG is generally about average in terms of relative deprivation. • Increasing population living in top 20% most deprived – particularly in Torbay. • Living environment, health and disability and employment deprivation are the biggest contributors to overall deprivation. • There has been a widening gap in relative levels of deprivation across the communities of South Devon and Torbay.