201310No 1 TOP 10 COUNTRIES AREA SUBMITTING MANUSCRIPTS

汤姆森预测2013年中国将在论文投稿前10国/地区中No. 1 TOP 10 COUNTRIES &AREA SUBMITTING MANUSCRIPTS PROJECTED CHANGE OVER 10 YEARS… 2003 4% 4% 2013 Projected United States 4% United Kingdom 5% 6% Germany 42% Italy 6% France 3% China 6% Japan 5% 4% United States 32% India 6% Iran, Islamic Republic of United Kingdom 6% Taiwan Canada 7% China 10% Spain 10% Australia 8% Turkey 10% 21% Japan Korea, Republic of Brazil 资料来源：A report from Thomson. Reuters in 2009 SSP conference

0 ROMANIA TURKEY MALAYSIA EGYPT MOROCCO RUSSIA INDIA PEOPLES R CHINA CROATIA BULGARIA SLOVAKIA BRAZIL TAIWAN VENEZUELA SOUTH KOREA POLAND SLOVENIA MEXICO THAILAND CZECH REPUBLIC ARGENTINA GREECE SOUTH AFRICA SINGAPORE PORTUGAL CHILE HUNGARY SPAIN JAPAN NEW ZEALAND NORTH IRELAND ITALY AUSTRALIA WALES FRANCE NORWAY ISRAEL 16 AUSTRIA GERMANY BELGIUM CANADA FINLAND ENGLAND SWEDEN SCOTLAND NETHERLANDS DENMARK USA SWITZERLAND ESSENTIAL SCIENCE INDICATORS – TOP 50 COUNTRIES & AREA (ALL FIELDS) RANKED BY TOTAL NUMBER OF CITATIONS PER PAPER(中国单篇文章的引用排 No. 42) 18 资料来源：A report from Thomson. Reuters in 2009 SSP conference 14 12 10 8 6 4 2

EXPECT MORE SUBMISSIONS RELATIVE TO OTHER COUNTRIES FROM THESE “HOT SPOTS”未来文章投稿的热点 区 资料来源：A report from Thomson. Reuters in 2009 SSP conference

PEER REVIEW CHALLENGES COMING? COUNTRIES WITH GROWING SUBMISSIONS AND LOWER ACCEPTANCE RATES(高投稿与低录用的地区) 资料来源：A report from Thomson. Reuters in 2009 SSP conference

D e Sw nm U itze ark ni te rla d nd St U ni Ge ate te rm s d Ki an ng y d Be om lg i N Ca um ew n Ze ada al Sw and ed N en or Au wa N st y et ra he lia rla n Fr ds an Au ce st r Ja ia pa Fi n nl an d Ita l Sp y Po ain rtu ga l I s Si ra ng e H ap l on o g re Ko G ng re e Po ce Ko la re a, M nd R ex ep ic ub o lic o Br f az Ta il iw a C n hi na Ira I nd n, i Is Eg a la m yp ic R Tur t ep ke ub y lic of 在 33个国家/地区，10000篇投稿中，接收率排序中国为 28 2002 -2008 ACCEPTANCE RATIOS COUNTRIES WITH MORE THAN 10, 000 SUBMISSIONS 50% 45% 资料来源：A report from Thomson. Reuters in 2009 SSP conference 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0%

引用举例1：Upto 2010/3/26 on Wo. S, for JZUS-A, only 291/843=35% cited, zero-citation of 65%

引用举例2：Upto 2011/3/26, for JZUS-B, 206/425=48% cited, on Wo. S, zero-citation about 52%,

简单举 2例：退稿原因 1. Reject （ZUSA-D-09 -007 xx） Comments to the paper (comments to be forwarded to the authors, please type in the text area above): Reviewer #1: I believe that the authors have done many work on this research. However, I do not find out any originality of the work presented in this paper, since all they have been reported before. Therefore, I cannot recommend this paper to be published on one journal. 主要退稿原因：不是原创！ 2. Reject（ZUSA-D-09 -007 xx） Comments: This paper is a 1: 1 copy of Khandaker Abir Rahman, Md. Shafaeat Hossain, Md. Al-Amin Bhuiyan, Tao Zhang, Md. Hasanuzzaman, H. Ueno, "Eye-Distance Based Mask Selection for Person Identification, " Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, International Conference on, pp. 114 -119, 2009 Third International Conference on Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 2009. Consequently this paper should be rejected, and I did not continue my review. 主要退稿原因： 1： 1复印别人的文章（copy)!

（1）从国内外视角谈三点看法 A. 科研跟踪阶段普遍存在的问题(也可以归结为是走“学术捷径shortcuts”，还是开发原创 a strong original and innovation ） 全世界都注意到近 30年来世界发展的几个动力区。而中国正处在一个历史上空前 的时期，国民经济的快速提升让中国人挺直了腰板，国内外都把目光聚焦在中国第 二步的发展， 是严正诚信，重力原创，如期迈向科技强国的行列？还是追求冠冕堂 皇的“捷径”成果，错失良机呢？现代历史上已经有这样的先例证明科研跟踪阶段必 须正视的问题，如一位美国院士举例，“在亚洲，同是美国“同盟”的菲律宾，正是由 于腐败使其经济足落后了50年，而日本却如期达到了目标；在欧洲，意大利有一批 非常优秀的科学家，如果不是政府对腐败的手软，它本可以与德国，法国，英国， 瑞士等齐肩并驱。相同的问题也发生在多年前的台湾地区，盗版书，音乐，软件， 以及其他 业产品等， 后来他们意识到如此下去只会弱化地区的实力发展，所以地 方当局开始实施法规，努力强化原创技术，提高竞争力”（For example, I remember many years ago there were major problems in Taiwan of piracy of books, music, software, and other industrial products. It was finally realized that this piracy had to stop---it was not good for economic development in Taiwan. I guess the local authorities worked hard to enforce regulations and this was important for the development of a strong and innovative technical industry, competitive in the world. The same is true for scientific development. Plagiarism ultimately weakens the quality of the science and is very dangerous. It‘s a form of corruption. It is well documented that there is an inverse relationship between economic development and corruption. The lack of economic development of the Philippines over the last 50 years is widely ascribed to corruption, … The rather weak performance of Italy both economically and scientifically is widely ascribed to corruption, even by the Italians. But it is a matter of degrees, Italy does have some very great scientists, but the nation would be world class, at the level of France, Britain, Germany or Switzerland, if it were not for corruption. ) 图例: 通过Déjà vu 对Medline 数据库(1975 -2005)的参考文献对比分析发现加, 法, 意 , 英, 中, 德, 日, 及美8国均有重复发表之嫌，但是中国接近 2倍……日本之前也有此问题

*如图所示: 重复发表是一个全 球的问题. 如 加, 法, 意 , 英, 中, 德, 日, 及美8国通过Déjà vu 与 Medline 数据库对比发现均有 重复发表之嫌, 但是中国和日本 接近 2倍, 分析说： “However, two of these countries, China and Japan, have estimated duplication rates that are roughly twice that expected for the number of publications they contribute to Medline. Perhaps the complexity of translation between different scripts, differences in ethics training and cultural norms contribute to elevated duplication rates” 1975 -2007 A search of 7 million abstracts, using the text-matching software e. TBLAST, reveals tens of thousands of highly similar articles. Are these legitimate or illegitimate publications? (unpublished data) Source: Nature 451, 24, 2008

Pay attention to the Ethical Issues（学术道德） JZUS (A/B/C, ) have been the first journals from China to become members of Cross. Check in 2008 ( http: //www. cro ssref. org/cros scheck_memb ers. html 我刊是第一家 中国会员

Cross. Check 的检查过程中，我们发现以下几种现象比较常见： 1 重复发表； 2、自我抄袭 ; 3原搬硬套； 4 搬来主义; 5拼凑成文 1. Duplicate publication; 2 Self- (or team) plagiarism; 3. Direct copying of Methods section, with new data inserted; 4. Uncited or excessive extracts . Figure 1 Duplicate publication 重复发表（1）；

（4）搬来主义， 不做任何引用标记 Uncited or excessive extracts Figure 4 Uncited extracts from other papers

关于“思想抄袭（Ideas plagiarism）”举例 ：（见下三封电子邮件） From: prof. Larry Bank, Program Director Structural Materials and Mechanics National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Blvd, Rm. 545, Arlington, VA 22230 phone: 703 -292 -2162 email: lbank@nsf. gov <bank@engr. wisc. edu> At 11: 12 PM 8/18/2010 Larry Bank wrote: (A): Thank you Dr. Zhang. I like your article. I am the former founding editor of the ASCE Journal of Composites for Construction and we grappled with many of these issues. The issue of self-plagiarism (or research group plagiarism) I particularly think we need to be aware of …. . as you say it wastes everyone's time. Best regards, Larry Bank (B): Dear prof. Bank. >2010 -08 -19 As managing editor, I very appreciate your great support and rigorous reviewing for our journals. Many thanks again. Yes, face up to plagiarism and misconducts in current times, we editors are doing our serious work for these problems ( please see the attached file). And also we are very thankful for our international peer referees here. Helen ZHANG (C): Dear Ms. Zhang: At 11: 12 PM 8/18/2010 I presume you have not been informed that the authors are withdrawing this paper. I alerted some of my colleagues when I realized that this work was copied from another investigator and he has asked them to withdraw – which they said they would do. Larry Bank

在国际专业出版联接协会（Cross. Ref)两页的中文手册中把该刊的两个封面与 其它国际名刊 《科学》《新英格兰》等一起展示Cross. Ref has included our two Chinese journals in the collage below as publicity for the international usage of Cross. Check now, and to promote greater usage in China.

Alan Singleton, the editor-in-Chief of “Learned Publishing” commented here “Well, we have two pieces on plagiarism – one from Kirsty Meddings of Cross. Ref, “Credit where credit’s due: plagiarism screening in scholarly publishing” LP, 23: 5– 8; and another a case study in China that is using it (Cross. Check), 23: 9– 14; apparently to some effect – a nice counter to any that might have thought they were not taking it seriously. There’s more to come on plagiarism in subsequent issues in 2010.

On Sep 13, 2010, at 16: 45 PM , An email from Prof. John Suppe, Member, US National Academy of Sciences ………………………………. . So I think it is important to China that some very strong people in China support you in this. It's a very important issue for the success of Chinese science. You might remember I wrote a short article on the growth of science for the 100 th anniversary of Nanjing University in which I forecast that the biggest contributor to growth of science worldwide in the 21 st Century would be China. However it is equally clear that there are various things that can keep China from tasting the highest success. Plagiarism and other short cuts to a false success can easily weaken Chinese science. I'm sure that the leaders of science in China fully realize this and will give close attention. Please let me know if I can be of any help. Sincerely. John Suppe Blair Professor of Geosciences Emeritus Department of Geosciences Princeton University Princeton NJ 08544 USA Member, US National Academy of Sciences