2011 April 1 Innovations in governance Ayo Ayo

生態議題論述 2011 April 1 Innovations in governance 鄭先祐 (Ayo) 國立臺南大學 生態科學與技術學系 教授 Ayo NUTN Web: http: //myweb. nutn. edu. tw/~hycheng/ 生態議題論述 2011

Five parts 2 1. Innovations in understanding complex systems 2. Innovations in evaluating agricultural development projects 3. Innovations in institutions to support people and the planet 4. Innovations in governance 5. Innovations in policy reform 生態議題論述 2011

Food security (糧食安全) 3 Agriculture is the world’s largest industry, employing more than 1 billion people and generating at least a trillion dollars’ worth of food annually. Yet nearly a billion people remain hungry, even while agriculture’s destructive impacts on climate and biodiversity continue to expand. In 2008 an alarming increase in the number of hungry people triggered numerous high-level conferences on food security. 生態議題論述 2011

The problem 4 The problem lies in this key fallacy: World hunger continues to be framed as a crisis of supply and demand that should be addressed mainly by improving agricultural output and development. This has resulted in undue emphasis (過度著重) on technological solutions such as genetic engineering and increased use of chemical inputs to boost production, while ignoring issues of governance and accountability related to aid commitments, public spending, public/private partnerships, and policy recommendations of international financial institutions and donor countries. 生態議題論述 2011

Overlooks GE 5 All approaches to end hunger: Agroecological, chemical-intensive, and genetic engineering But this attempt ignores the fact that most agricultural investment today is going into technical solutions that concentrate power in hands of a few while missing the social and environmental potential of others. More important, it overlooks genetic engineering and carries poorly studied environmental and health risks. 生態議題論述 2011

GE- promoters 6 1. 2. 私人跨國公司(Monsanto) US Agency for International Development. 3. Agricultural Biotechnology Support Program (ABSP) Philanthropic institutions, including the Rockefeller Foundation and the Gates Foundation has spent millions of dollars on the development of GE “nutritious” cassava, bananas, rice, and sorghum. Nearly 80% of Gates Foundation funding in 生態議題論述 2011

7 Gates Foundation awarded a $21. 2 million fiveyear grant in 2009 to the International Potato Center to produce high yielding, stress-tolerant varieties of sweet potato and nearly $1. 4 million for three years to Centro International de Agricultura Tropical in 2010 to support efforts aimed at accelerating breeding of cassava for greater productivity, disease resistance and other traits. Rockefeller Foundation and the Syngenta Foundation, it is funding the Insect Resistant Maize for Africa Project at the Kenya Agricultural 生態議題論述 2011 Research Institute.

9 Monsanto stock price 20002010 生態議題論述 2011

Under investigation 10 Monsanto's development and marketing of genetically engineered seed and bovine growth hormone, as well as its aggressive litigation, political lobbying practices, seed commercialization practices and "strong-arming" of the seed industry have made the company controversial around the world and a primary target of the alter-globalization movement and environmental activists. As a result of its business strategies and licensing agreements, Monsanto came under investigation by the U. S. Justice Department in 2009. 生態議題論述 2011

Food security (個人與組織) 11 Belo Horizonte in Brazil is recognized as a world pioneer in governance for food security. Citizens’ right to food was actively realized through several innovative programs, including a council of citizen, labor, business, and church representatives to advise in the design and implementation of a new food system; participatory budgeting; “Direct from the Country” farmer produce stands in busy downtown areas; markets that provide food at about two thirds of the market price; “People’s Restaurants” that daily serve 12, 000 or more people (less than 50 cents a meal). 生態議題論述 2011

國家位階的行動 12 In Indonesia, after achieving self-sufficiency in rice in 1984 the government liberalized its agricultural markets in the 1990 s and drastically reduced public support to its farmers. By 1998, the tables had turned and the country was the world’s largest importer of rice and largest recipient of international food aid. The government reversed its liberalization policy in 2002 and curbed imports of rice while encouraging domestic production through higher tariffs. Indonesia 生態議題論述 2011 once again in was self-sufficient in rice

Useful tools 13 1. 2. 3. Push-pull intercropping technology Need an ombudsman (人權運動者), and independent authority with the power to mediate between an institution and the people. Social audits (審計)， for ensuring that funders and corporations are supporting truly sustainable agriculture. The goal is careful assessments of the social and environmental effects of economic actions. 生態議題論述 2011

14 Push-pull intercropping technology 生態議題論述 2011

A paradigm shift 15 World hunger is rooted in poverty and environmental degradation, intervention and a paradigm shift are required that would recognize agriculture as being fundamental to the well-being of all people. 生態議題論述 2011

問題與討論 Ayo NUTN website: http: //myweb. nutn. edu. tw/~hycheng/