15 T Demonstrator mechanical design analysis and optimization

  • Slides: 17
Download presentation
15 T Demonstrator: mechanical design, analysis and optimization Igor Novitski Video Meeting 18 October

15 T Demonstrator: mechanical design, analysis and optimization Igor Novitski Video Meeting 18 October 2016

Outline • • 2 Magnet concept evolution Models and Materials Design 1: C-Clamp Design

Outline • • 2 Magnet concept evolution Models and Materials Design 1: C-Clamp Design 2: IC-Clamp “HD-2” structure optimization Design 3: AL Cylinder Summary Igor Novitski | Mechanical analysis October 18, 2016

Magnet Concept Evolution C-Clamp Magnet 3 Igor Novitski | Mechanical analysis I-Clamp Magnet Al

Magnet Concept Evolution C-Clamp Magnet 3 Igor Novitski | Mechanical analysis I-Clamp Magnet Al Shell Magnet October 18, 2016

Geometry Comparison 15 T Dipole D 20 VMTF Dewar 4 Igor Novitski | Mechanical

Geometry Comparison 15 T Dipole D 20 VMTF Dewar 4 Igor Novitski | Mechanical analysis October 18, 2016

FEA Models Coils in “HD 2” Structure C-Clamp Magnet I-Clamp Magnet 5 Igor Novitski

FEA Models Coils in “HD 2” Structure C-Clamp Magnet I-Clamp Magnet 5 Igor Novitski | Mechanical analysis October 18, 2016

Material Properties Structural element Coil (rad/azim) In. coil pole blocks Out. coil pole blocks

Material Properties Structural element Coil (rad/azim) In. coil pole blocks Out. coil pole blocks Wedges Coil-yoke spacer Clamp Yoke Skin 6 Material Nb 3 Sn composite Ti-6 Al-4 V St St Bronze St St Aluminum Iron St St 316 Igor Novitski | Mechanical analysis Thermal contract. (300 -2 K), mm/m 2. 9/3. 3 warm 35/20 cold 40/40 warm n/a cold n/a 1. 7 2. 9 3. 2 2. 9 4. 1 2. 0 2. 9 115 195 110 190 70 205 190 125 215 120 210 81 225 210 650 230 280 230 500 220 290 >900 500 350 500 700 580 Elasticity modulus, GPa Yield stress, MPa October 18, 2016

Design 1: C-Clamp+20 mm Skin, FEA Results 300 K Seqv=120 MPa Seqv=725 MPa 7

Design 1: C-Clamp+20 mm Skin, FEA Results 300 K Seqv=120 MPa Seqv=725 MPa 7 4 K 4 K+15 T Seqv=158 MPa Seqv=850 MPa Igor Novitski | Mechanical analysis Seqv=179 MPa Inner Pole Gap=0. 002 mm Seqv=880 MPa October 18, 2016

Design 2: IC-Clamp+12 mm Skin, FEA Model d Skin and skin thickness Yoke-Yoke gap

Design 2: IC-Clamp+12 mm Skin, FEA Model d Skin and skin thickness Yoke-Yoke gap taper Coil-Coil Rad interference X 1 Y 2 X 2 Clamp-Yoke angle and interference R Shell-Yoke Rad interference Step Y 1 Clamp-Skin Rad Yoke-Skin Rad interference Pole slot Mid-Plane shims 8 Igor Novitski | Mechanical analysis October 18, 2016

Design 2: IC-Clamp+12 mm Skin, FEA Results 300 K 9 4 K+15 T 4

Design 2: IC-Clamp+12 mm Skin, FEA Results 300 K 9 4 K+15 T 4 K Seqv=133 MPa Seqv=176 MPa Spole=472 MPa Sskin=280 MPa Spole=724 MPa Sskin=404 MPa Igor Novitski | Mechanical analysis Seqv=168 MPa Inner Pole Gap=0 mm Syoke=448 MPa Sskin=428 MPa October 18, 2016

Design 2: IC-Clamp+12 mm Skin, FEA Results 300 K Seqv=115 MPa Seqv=118 MPa 10

Design 2: IC-Clamp+12 mm Skin, FEA Results 300 K Seqv=115 MPa Seqv=118 MPa 10 Igor Novitski | Mechanical analysis 4 K Seqv=353 MPa Seqv=280 MPa 4 K+15 T Seqv=448 MPa Seqv=292 MPa October 18, 2016

AL Shell Design HD 2 11 Igor Novitski | Mechanical analysis 15 T Alternative

AL Shell Design HD 2 11 Igor Novitski | Mechanical analysis 15 T Alternative October 18, 2016

Parametric Model of the Structure 1 2 3 4 Al Shell: 50 and 70

Parametric Model of the Structure 1 2 3 4 Al Shell: 50 and 70 mm thick Iron Pad: 2 or 4 -piece Iron Yoke: 2 or 4 -piece 12 Igor Novitski | Mechanical analysis October 18, 2016

Design 3: 50 mm AL Cylinder, FEA Results 300 K Seqv=118 MPa 4 K+15

Design 3: 50 mm AL Cylinder, FEA Results 300 K Seqv=118 MPa 4 K+15 T 4 K Seqv=190 MPa Seqv=165 MPa Inner Pole Gap=0. 3 um 13 Igor Novitski | Mechanical analysis October 18, 2016

Design 3: 50 mm AL Cylinder, FEA Results 300 K 14 Igor Novitski |

Design 3: 50 mm AL Cylinder, FEA Results 300 K 14 Igor Novitski | Mechanical analysis 4 K 4 K+15 T October 18, 2016

15 T Demonstrator Support Structures Baseline Igor Novitski | Mechanical analysis Alternative October 18,

15 T Demonstrator Support Structures Baseline Igor Novitski | Mechanical analysis Alternative October 18, 2016

Comparison of Baseline and Alternative Designs Contact gaps at poles Al Shell at 15

Comparison of Baseline and Alternative Designs Contact gaps at poles Al Shell at 15 T: Inner Pole Gap=0. 3 um (30%) Layer 3 pole Gap=4 um (15%) Baseline at 15 T: Inner Pole Gap =0 um Layer 3 pole Gap=7 um (20%) 16 Igor Novitski | Mechanical analysis October 18, 2016

Summary – Several concepts of mechanical structure have been analysed and compared. – Mechanical

Summary – Several concepts of mechanical structure have been analysed and compared. – Mechanical designs with IC-Clamps (Baseline) provides the required coil prestress and restricts turn radial, azimuthal and longitudinal motion for the operating current range up to 15 T. – Alternative magnet support structure based on a 50 mm thick aluminum shell, 4 -piece iron yoke and 2 -piece iron pad behave likewise. – Both structures allow keeping the stresses in the coil and support structure within acceptable limits during magnet assembly and operation. 17 Igor Novitski | Mechanical analysis October 18, 2016