1 Introduction Title Is discovery necessary My answer

1 Introduction Title <Is discovery necessary? My answer is ‘Yes’. > Is Discovery Necessary? My Answer Is ‘Yes’. Introductory idea Many people think that discovery harms the nature. I think that discovery contributes to many things But are in terms of global world. There is several reasons. Thesis statement

2 Reason 1 Move to first paragraph First, many people think that discovery harm the nature, however, it is not. For example, in <정글의 법칙>, the cast members receive mission that it is not allowed to hunt any other animals. But plant is allowed. above, many wild variety programs do As not allow don’t harm the nature. Rather, these programs inform us that tribe’s culture is different from us. Supporting idea Topic sentence First, many wild variety programs don’t harm the nature. Rather, these programs inform us that tribe’s culture is different from us. For example, in <정글의 법칙>, the cast members receive mission that do not allow to hunt any other animals.

3 Reason 2 Topic sentence diversity Second, discovery contributes to cultural pluralism. Many TV programs, one of examples <정글의 법칙> depict tribe’s life like eating, clothing and shelter. These living components become cultures, and by media, it is introduced by news, TV, Interne Lack of logical basis Supporting idea Second, discovery contributes to cultural diversity. Many TV programs depict tribes’ life like eating, clothing and living. Their lives reveal and spread all around the world. Finally, these components become ‘acknowledged culture’ by people.

4 Reason 3 Topic sentence Third, through the contribution of cultural diversity, affluent global village society can be formed. From advanced countries to minority tribes like developing countries, many aids are supported. By doing so, many problems like hunger, poverty can be resolved. Inconsistency of the word Supporting idea Third, through the contribution of cultural diversity, affluent global society can be formed. As advanced countries, they can support minority tribes. Therefore many problems like hunger and poverty can be resolved.

5 Conclusion As the global village society, international contributions and contribute to cultural Topic sentence diversity through the discovery I think that is worth. In the information age, we will be able to contribute to cultural diversity, too. Same as third paragraph As the global society, it is worth that cultural diversity and international contributions through discovery. In the information age, we will be able to live affluent life with discovery.

◆Introduction Title : Is discovery a always good thing? Is Discovery a Always Good Thing? +Thesis Statement discovery is not obligation and discovery is not right. we have to respect their life, not anymore destroy rain forest. Discovery is not an obligation, also we can't arrogate other people for the reason of right-to-know. We have to respect other's life.

◆Body 1 despite of civilized modern society, tribe has lived in rain forest. for example there is Amazonian rain forest they have lived in village rain forest. Unlike other civilized society, tribe has lived in nature like rain forest. For example there is Amazonian rain forest where natives lived, forming villages in unknown nature. the tribe is known by TV, internet. after many people are now aware of village’s existence. a debate has begun about new risks and dangers to the tribe. But recently, those tribe was discovered and introduced by TV and internet. Consequently now many people were aware of their existence. At that point, new debates about risks and dangers of the tribe have aroused.

◆Body 2 Many explorer, people went to Amazonian rain forest, then tribe died diseases that introduced to them simple viruses such as the flu, which westerners have natural defences against, can prove fatal to tribes that have always lived in isolation. Many people like explorers or tourists went to Amazonian rain forest. For that reason the tribe died for disease that carried from visitors, such as flu. Because they haven't any immunity of disease, it can be fatal to them.

◆Conclusion culture is relative. we may have curiosed their life and culture. however we have to admit their culture and we must surpress that we are debate their life. discovery is destroy environment. Like this case, humanity is always relative. Our little curiosity made huge disaster. We must debate that our discovery can destroy their life and environment.

Introduction • Title: Is discovery a always good thing? Is Discovery Always a Good Thing? • Thesis statement: I think we should protect natives and environment. • Hook: Nowadays, they are suffer from aggression of people who want to discover undeveloped environment and culture. • Background information: Natives get ill from people who develop them thoughtlessly. The disease leads them to the death. Natives get ill because of the people who develop their environment thoughtlessly. This development may eventually lead them to the death.

Body 1 • Topic sentence: Introduction about natives’ culture and beautiful nature is new and marvelous to people in civilization. However, it leads natives and nature to be lost. A discovery can lead natives’ culture and nature to be lost. • Concluding sentence: No matter how tried to conserve nature people destroy them. So it isn’t sustainable. These people’s contact make destruction of the environment. Contact with civilized people can make destruction of the environment.

Body 2 Importantly, natives reject strangers. Stranger’s visit makes people die. They lose their neighbors even family members. (And by visiting to natives culture, people spread their own culture besides learn natives culture. ) With this, natives culture’s essentials are lost. They can’t retain their life, and in nature, wild animals are killed from people. Also food chain get tangled. An exploration can be a threat to the ecosystem.

Conclusion Discovery contribute to confuse in the nature world. If we discover all the nature in this way, it can’t exist anymore. For saving nature and natives’ life, we should stop to discover. I think discovery have to halt. Discovery contributes to confusion in the nature world. If we discover all the nature in this way, the nature can’t be sustained anymore. For saving nature and lives of natives, we should stop discovering. I think discovery has to be halted.

Thank you!