1 Cost and Schedule WBS 1 0 David
1 Cost and Schedule WBS 1. 0 David M. Lee Los Alamos National Lab Deputy Project Leader David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
2 Talk Outline Forward Vertex Detector Cost & Schedule • Participating Institutions • Organizational plan • Changes since Nov 2007 • Cost • Schedule David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
3 Participating and Interested Institutions Los Alamos National Laboratory LANL coordinate work to procure the silicon sensors, work with FNAL on the development of the PHX chip, on development of the interface to PHENIX DAQ, and on the simulation effort with NMSU. Los Alamos is currently leading the mechanical engineering and the integration effort for the barrel detector, VTX, and will continue those efforts for the FVTX. Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Involvment still under discussion Brookhaven National Laboratory Brookhaven manages the integration and ancillary systems for the VTX and will do the same for the FVTX. They might also participate in software and the assembly of the disks and cages. Charles University, Czech Technical University, Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences, Prague The Czech groups will participate in sensor testing Columbia University has major responsibility with the complete wedge assembly and testing. They are also have coresponsibility for the FPHX chip and are active in the software simulations. Iowa State University is currently working on management details with the barrel detector and working on an (funded) SBIR effort for the level one trigger capabilities of the FVTX. New Mexico State University NMSU will be responsible for the FVTX detector assembly, as well as managing and working on comprehensive simulations for the FVTX effort and working on the sensor testing. Saclay will work on software.
4 Participating and Interested Institutions University of Jyvaskyla Involvment still under discussion. Have indicated that they will contribute students in the assembly and testing University of New Mexico UNM has experience in testing, Q/A and a laboratory for characterization of sensors. They will participate in sensor testing They may also work on the HDI and flex cables. Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea Involvment still under discussion David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
5 Organizational Chart DOE Office of Nuclear Physics Helmut Marsiske Federal Program Manager BNL Program Manager Tom Ludlam BNL PHENIX FVTX Project Office Project Manager: M. Brooks (LANL) Deputy Project Manager: D. Lee (LANL) Electronics Project Engineer: E. Mannel (Columbia) Mechanical Project Engineer: W. Sondheim (LANL) PHENIX Management Spokesperson B. Jacak Operation Manager E. O’Brien Upgrade Manager A. Drees DAQ M. Brooks LANL Sensor J. Kapustinsky/ LANL FPHX J. Kapustinsky/ D. Winter LANL/Columbia Cabling D. Fields UNM Wedge D. Winter Columbia Integration Mechanics R. Pak BNL Assembly Installation S. Pate NMSU Software van. Hecke, X. Wang LANL, NMSU ROC M. Prokop LANL Sensor Design J. Kapustinsky LANL, Columbia, Czech FPHX Design R. Yarema FNAL, LANL, Columbia HDI M. Hoferkamp UNM, Columbia Wedge Assembly D. Winter/TBD Columbia, NMSU, UNM Mech Structures D. Lee LANL Disk Assembly S. Pate/PD NMSU Simulation X. Wang NMSU, LANL, Saclay FEM M. Prokop LANL Sensor QA D. Winter/TBD Columbia, UNM, Czech FPHX QA R. Yarema FNAL, LANL Flex Cable D. Fields UNM Wire Bond D. Winter/TBD Columbia Ancillary Service R. Pak BNL Disk Metrology S. Pate/PD NMSU Fibers D. Fields UNM Wedge QA D. Winter/TBD Columbia, NMSU UNM QA S. Butsyk LANL Metrology D. Winter/TBD Columbia David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008 Cage Assembly S. Pate/PD NMSU Database D. Winter Offline Hugo Pereira
FVTX Cost Estimate David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008 6
7 Updated Costs in At Year dollars WBS item Base Cost Actual Cost Quoted Cost 1. 4. 1. 2. 1 sensor mask set $51. 8 k $67 k 1. 4. 1. 2. 2 sensor prototype $25. 9 k $36. 9 k 1. 4. 1. 3. 1 production sensor $439. 2 k $381. 5 k 1. 4. 2. 1, 2 first FPHX prototype $0 $174 k 1. 4. 3. 2. 1 HDI prototype $10. 4 $30 k 1. 6 Final design drawings $67 k 1. 6. 3. 3 production wedge backplane $146. 8 k $63 k 1. 6. 4. 3. 5 cage tooling jig $10. 7 k $7. 8 k total $751. 8 *Costs include burden and taxes $374. 9 $452. 3 David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008 ($75. 4)
8 Funding and Spending Profiles David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
9 Project Manpower Fractional Cost Integrated over project 63% 37% David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
10 Estimated Manpower Ave Tech = $100 k Ave Engineer = $200 k From Workforce Spreadsheets- covers all scientists, and training for postdocs and students. U. S participants only. From FVTX Project File, does not include contract personnel David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
11 On Project Workforce Includes contract personnel David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
12 On Project M&S Costs David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
13 Risk Mitigation • Sensors - “standard” p-n diode, decades old technology - Mini-strips, minimize channel count, control occupancy - uses standard wire bonding techniques • HDI - not state-of-the-art, conforms to industry standards more complicated than previously expected, added electrical engineer, simulations • FPHX - based on previous successful chips - low power, simplifies mechanical designs, cooling system 1 st prototype very successful • DAQ - not state-of-the-art, commercial components, easily integrates into PHENIX DAQ - ROC board is more complex, added expert ECAD designer, simulations • Mechanical – room temperature, low power, experienced team • Wedge - simple design due to low power, no chips on sensor • Cage and Disk - modular designs, not dependent on VTX - simplifies integration David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
14 FVTX Cost and Schedule Changes • Construction start – January 1, 2008 ( 2 st QTR FY 08) – Started April 1 • DOE Funding – FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 Apr 08 $500 k $2400 k $2000 k • Added 4 ½ months float on critical path • 1 st FPHX MOSIS delayed to June – FNAL designers needed more time • Delayed ROC/FEM start to FY 2009 – due to funding • Sensor prototype start Jun 08 – small changes and change in procurement • HDI prototype delays – designer availability David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
15 FVTX Cost &Schedule Issues and concerns • HDI prototype delays milestones for system tests and test with FPHX chip • HDI prototype is now on critical path • 4 week delay in FY 2009 for funding start • FPHX engineer availability at FNAL David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
16 FVTX Schedule NOTE: Includes R&D Calender years Schedule Float 4 ½ months David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
17 FVTX Schedule delay Delayed by funding David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
18 FVTX Schedule Delay by funding David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
19 FVTX Schedule David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
20 FVTX Schedule David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
21 Current year Funding and Spending Profile David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
22 Current year Funding and Spending Profile David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
23 FVTX Component Production Start Dates • • Sensor FPHX HDI prototype ROC FEM Cage Wedge Disk 2/11/09 11 months float* 12/17/09 4 1/2 months float (on critical path) 1/2/09 4 1/2 months float (on critical path) 10/1/09 6 months float* 10/1/09 3 months float* 6/1/09 9 months float* 2/2/09 11 months float* 2/2/09 9 months float* * Float to critical path David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
24 FVTX Milestones WBS 1. 1 DOE construction funds received Q 3 FY 08 WBS 1. 6. 2. 2. 2 Review and approve wedge, disk, cage design Q 3 FY 08 WBS 1. 4. 3. 2. 5 HDI tested Q 3 FY 08 Q 1 FY 09 WBS 1. 4. 1. 2. 3 Sensor prototype tested Q 1 FY 09 WBS 1. 4. 1. 2. 5 First prototype wedge assembly complete Q 1 FY 09 WBS 1. 5. 2. 2. 6 PHENIX system test complete Q 1 FY 09 WBS 1. 5. 2. 2. 8 Review and approve FEM and ROC Q 3 FY 09 WBS 1. 4. 1. 3. 1 Sensor Procurement complete Q 3 FY 09 WBS 1. 4. 1. 2. 6 Wedge assembly test complete Q 4 FY 09 WBS 1. 4. 2. 5. 1 FPHX engineering run complete Q 1 FY 10 WBS 1. 5. 3 ROC and FEM production complete Q 2 FY 10 WBS 1. 7. 1 Start endcap assembly Q 3 FY 10 WBS 1. 5. 5. 6 Ancillary electronics installed Q 4 FY 10 WBS 1. 7. 2 Start installation into cage enclosure Q 4 FY 10 WBS 1. 7. 1. 1 Place wedges on cooling plate complete Q 1 FY 11 WBS 1. 7. 2. 1 ½ Cage assembly complete Q 2 FY 11 WBS 1. 7. 3 Install cages into VTX enclosure complete Q 2 FY 11 WBS 1. 7. 5 Verify functional requirements and Project Complete Q 3 FY 11 David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
25 Cost Basis and Status as of October 2008 David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
26 Summary • Mechanical 90% design complete • FPHX chip 1 st prototype complete and successful • ROC FVTX board pre production prototype in design • FEM FVTX board pre production prototype in design • HDI prototype now critical issue • Cost Basis is in good shape • Construction and testing complete Nov 2011 • Construction Schedule points to FY 2012 as data run David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
27 Summary WBS No. 1. 0 - Cost and Schedule • Cost $4. 88 M at year $ • R&D needed FPHX, HDI, DAQ • Cost Basis vendor quotes and Eng. Est. • Cost Contingency 26% • Schedule Start and Complete 04/01/2008 – 6/29/11 • Schedule Contingency risk based • Risk low (FPHX and HDI moderate) David Lee, FVTX Review Nov 2008
- Slides: 27