1 A Shift In Learning A Shift in

  • Slides: 29
Download presentation
1 A Shift In Learning A Shift in Teaching A Shift In Measuring Learning

1 A Shift In Learning A Shift in Teaching A Shift In Measuring Learning A Shift In Measuring Accountability Jennifer Bourgeois, Ph. D. Director of Research, Evaluation and School Improvement 2018 CA Dashboard – AP Academy February 25, 2019

“ 2 An Instructional Focus is a school-wide commitment to specific, collaboratively agreed upon,

“ 2 An Instructional Focus is a school-wide commitment to specific, collaboratively agreed upon, evidence-based practices that improve teaching and learning. Implementation occurs in a supportive classroom environment, informed by cycles of inquiry. LITERACY MATH GAP

Definition: Cycles of Inquiry is a process by which an individual or group does

Definition: Cycles of Inquiry is a process by which an individual or group does the following: Analyze Data Identify a problem Identify “root cause” Evaluate Results Make a plan of action Take Action

Definition: Problem of Practice focuses on the instructional core. is directly observable. is actionable.

Definition: Problem of Practice focuses on the instructional core. is directly observable. is actionable. connects to a broader strategy of improvement. is high-leverage. is deep learning. From: Identifying a “Problem of Practice”

Objectives: Inform about the new CA Dashboard Inform about the new Accountability System –

Objectives: Inform about the new CA Dashboard Inform about the new Accountability System – both State and Federal Inform about Accountability as it relates to CNUSD Messaging Toolkit for Stakeholder Groups

Why do we have a Dashboard? • Provides annual outcome data and should generate

Why do we have a Dashboard? • Provides annual outcome data and should generate questions. • It is NOT the only source of data. • Provides a focus and/or an entry point for additional investigation. • It does NOT provide answers to system challenges or root causes. • Provides student group results to support equity conversations. • It is NOT intended to blame student groups or schools. • It requires that we check biases and assumptions before acting. • Provides an indication of where needs may exist for student groups, schools, districts within the education system and system of support. • It is NOT a hammer.

8 California Dashboard A New Accountability Model Multiple Measures Focus On Equity Supporting Local

8 California Dashboard A New Accountability Model Multiple Measures Focus On Equity Supporting Local Decision-Making

9 Six State Indicators High School Graduation Rate English Learner Progress Academic Performance Preparation

9 Six State Indicators High School Graduation Rate English Learner Progress Academic Performance Preparation for College/Career Suspension Rate Chronic Absenteeism

10 Four Local Indicators Basic Conditions . Implementation of. Academic Standards . School Climate

10 Four Local Indicators Basic Conditions . Implementation of. Academic Standards . School Climate Surveys Parent Involvement. And Engagement

Example of Academic Indicator - 5 x 5 Matrix from the CA Dashboard 11

Example of Academic Indicator - 5 x 5 Matrix from the CA Dashboard 11 Comparison between the current year and the previous year with respect to average distance from “Standard Met” Current Year Average Distance from “Standard Met” Status Change

12

12

13

13

14

14

15 LCFF and ESSA Accountability

15 LCFF and ESSA Accountability

Key Terms D. A. – Differentiated Assistance CSI – Comprehensive Support and Improvement TSI

Key Terms D. A. – Differentiated Assistance CSI – Comprehensive Support and Improvement TSI – Targeted Support and Improvement ATSI – Additional Targeted Support and Improvement

LCFF (State Accountability) • District Level Identification • Level 2 – Differentiated Assistance (D.

LCFF (State Accountability) • District Level Identification • Level 2 – Differentiated Assistance (D. A. ) • Identified through the dashboard by subgroup • Annually identified 18

How does a district enter Differentiated Assistance? Pupil Achievement (Priority 4) • Red on

How does a district enter Differentiated Assistance? Pupil Achievement (Priority 4) • Red on both English language arts and math tests, or • Red on English language arts or math test and Orange on the other test • [ELPI Not Available for 2018] Pupil Engagement (Priority 5) • Red on Graduation Rate Indicator, or • Red on Chronic Absence Indicator School Climate (Priority 6) • Red on Suspension Rate Indicator, Outcomes in a Broad Course of Study (Priority 8) • Red on College/Career Indicator 19

20 Priority 5 Priority 6 Priority 5 Priority 8 Priority 4

20 Priority 5 Priority 6 Priority 5 Priority 8 Priority 4

According to RCOE, predicted CNUSD and school site results – Official in January 2019

According to RCOE, predicted CNUSD and school site results – Official in January 2019 Differentiated Assistance – CNUSD not in D. A. • In Riverside County, 16 of 24 LEAs identified for D. A. • 374 LEAs State wide • 239 New • 135 Remained • 93 Exited 21

Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI) - Schools: • Schools identified for CSI: • Low

Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI) - Schools: • Schools identified for CSI: • Low Performing Title I • High Schools – Graduation rate below 67% average over 2 – years (includes all high schools) • Implications • Additional state funding will be allocated • Funding needs to be referenced within the LCAP as to how it supports school improvement. • A comprehensive needs assessment within the SPSA needs to be developed, implemented and approved by the State. • The LEA provides support in the implementation and monitoring of the plan. 22

Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI) - Schools: • Criteria for schools to be identified

Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI) - Schools: • Criteria for schools to be identified for CSI: • Schools with all red indicators; • Schools with all red but one indicator of any other color; • Schools with all red and orange indicators; and • Schools with five or more indicators where the majority are red. 23

Senarios - CSI Example 1 - Ruby Union High School did not receive Title

Senarios - CSI Example 1 - Ruby Union High School did not receive Title I funds for the 2017– 18 school year. Example 2 - Jasper Middle School received Title I funds for the 2017– 18 school year. 24

Targeted Support and Improvement (TSI) / Additional Targeted Support and Improvement (ATSI) - Schools:

Targeted Support and Improvement (TSI) / Additional Targeted Support and Improvement (ATSI) - Schools: • Schools identified for TSI/ATSI: • All schools eligible • Based subgroup performance over 2 - years • Implications • No additional funding. • A plan needs to be developed and implemented. • The LEA provides support in the implementation and monitoring of the plan. 25

Targeted Support and Improvement (TSI) / Additional Targeted Support and Improvement (ATSI) - Schools:

Targeted Support and Improvement (TSI) / Additional Targeted Support and Improvement (ATSI) - Schools: • Criteria for schools to be identified for TSI/ATSI: • All red indicators (student group must have at least two indicators); • All red but one indicator of any other color; • All red and orange indicators; and • Five or more indicators where the majority are red. 26

Scenarios – TSI/ATSI Example 3 - Onyx High School Example 4 - Agate Middle

Scenarios – TSI/ATSI Example 3 - Onyx High School Example 4 - Agate Middle School 27

Exploration CA Dashboard Exploration • • What do you notice? What do you wonder?

Exploration CA Dashboard Exploration • • What do you notice? What do you wonder? What gaps do you notice? What problem of practice is emerging from the data? • How will this information fit into the cycles of inquiry at your site? 28

Messaging 29 Communications Toolkit • Powerpoint & Talking Points • • Customizable letter template

Messaging 29 Communications Toolkit • Powerpoint & Talking Points • • Customizable letter template to send to parents Social Media Graphics Webpage with more resources & info Parent informational flyers